Blog

Kakinuma, K. et al. Flood-induced population displacements in the world. Environ. Res. Lett. 15(12), 124029 (2020).

Google Scholar 

Rentschler, J. et al. Global evidence of rapid urban growth in flood zones since 1985. Nature 622(7981), 87–92 (2023).

Google Scholar 

Duan, Y. et al. Increasing global flood risk in 2005–2020 from a multi-scale perspective. Remote Sens. 14(21), 5551 (2022).

Google Scholar 

Yamazaki, D., Watanabe, S. & Hirabayashi, Y. Global flood risk modeling and projections of climate change impacts. In Global Flood Hazard: Applications in Modeling, Mapping, and Forecasting 185–203 (2018).

Google Scholar 

Koç, G., Natho, S. & Thieken, A. H. Estimating direct economic impacts of severe flood events in Turkey (2015–2020). Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 58, 102222 (2021).

Google Scholar 

Armal, S. et al. Assessing property level economic impacts of climate in the US, new insights and evidence from a comprehensive flood risk assessment tool. Climate 8(10), 116 (2020).

Google Scholar 

Huppert, H. E. & Sparks, R. S. J. Extreme natural hazards: Population growth, globalization and environmental change. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 364(1845), 1875–1888 (2006).

Google Scholar 

Eekhout, J. P. et al. Why increased extreme precipitation under climate change negatively affects water security. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 22(11), 5935–5946 (2018).

Google Scholar 

Tabari, H. Climate change impact on flood and extreme precipitation increases with water availability. Sci. Rep. 10(1), 13768 (2020).

Google Scholar 

Rutgersson, A. et al. Natural hazards and extreme events in the Baltic Sea region. Earth Syst. Dyn. Discussions 2021, 1–80 (2021).

Google Scholar 

Yousefi, S. et al. A machine learning framework for multi-hazards modeling and mapping in a mountainous area. Sci. Rep. 10(1), 12144 (2020).

Google Scholar 

Pourghasemi, H. R. et al. Assessing and mapping multi-hazard risk susceptibility using a machine learning technique. Sci. Rep. 10(1), 3203 (2020).

Google Scholar 

Rahmati, O. et al. Multi-hazard exposure mapping using machine learning techniques: A case study from Iran. Remote Sens. 11(16), 1943 (2019).

Google Scholar 

Youssef, A. M. et al. Multi-hazards (landslides, floods, and gully erosion) modeling and mapping using machine learning algorithms. J. Afr. Earth Sc. 197, 104788 (2023).

Google Scholar 

LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y. & Hinton, G. Deep learning. Nature 521(7553), 436–444 (2015).

Google Scholar 

Singh, A., N. Thakur, and A. Sharma. A review of supervised machine learning algorithms. in 2016 3rd international conference on computing for sustainable global development (INDIACom). 2016. Ieee.

Chen, Y. Flood hazard zone mapping incorporating geographic information system (GIS) and multi-criteria analysis (MCA) techniques. J. Hydrol. 612, 128268 (2022).

Google Scholar 

Eini, M. et al. Hazard and vulnerability in urban flood risk mapping: Machine learning techniques and considering the role of urban districts. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 50, 101687 (2020).

Google Scholar 

Hong, H. et al. Application of fuzzy weight of evidence and data mining techniques in construction of flood susceptibility map of Poyang County, China. Sci. Total Environ. 625, 575–588 (2018).

Google Scholar 

Tamiru, H. & Dinka, M. O. Application of ANN and HEC-RAS model for flood inundation mapping in lower Baro Akobo River Basin, Ethiopia. J. Hydrol. Reg. Stud. 36, 100855 (2021).

Google Scholar 

Khoirunisa, N., Ku, C.-Y. & Liu, C.-Y. A GIS-based artificial neural network model for flood susceptibility assessment. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 18(3), 1072 (2021).

Google Scholar 

Moradian, S. et al. Forecasting of compound ocean-fluvial floods using machine learning. J. Environ. Manage. 364, 121295 (2024).

Google Scholar 

Taromideh, F. et al. Urban flood-risk assessment: Integration of decision-making and machine learning. Sustainability 14(8), 4483 (2022).

Google Scholar 

Shen, C. & Lawson, K. Applications of deep learning in hydrology. In Deep Learning for the Earth Sciences: A Comprehensive Approach to Remote Sensing, Climate Science, and Geosciences 283–297 (2021).

Google Scholar 

Mojaddadi, H. et al. Ensemble machine-learning-based geospatial approach for flood risk assessment using multi-sensor remote-sensing data and GIS. Geomat. Nat. Hazards Risk 8(2), 1080–1102 (2017).

Google Scholar 

Wang, J.-H. et al. Application of hybrid machine learning model for flood hazard zoning assessments. Stoch. Env. Res. Risk Assess. 37(1), 395–412 (2023).

Google Scholar 

Chen, J., Huang, G. & Chen, W. Towards better flood risk management: Assessing flood risk and investigating the potential mechanism based on machine learning models. J. Environ. Manage. 293, 112810 (2021).

Google Scholar 

El Baida, M. et al. A systematic literature review on regression machine learning for urban flood hazard mapping. In International Conference on Digital Technologies and Applications (Springer, 2024).

Google Scholar 

Pham, B. T. et al. Flood risk assessment using deep learning integrated with multi-criteria decision analysis. Knowledge Based Syst 219, 106899 (2021).

Google Scholar 

Kazemi, M. et al. Flood susceptibility mapping using machine learning and remote sensing data in the Southern Karun Basin Iran. Appl. Geomat. 16(3), 731–750 (2024).

Google Scholar 

Chowdhury, M. E. et al. A machine learning-based approach for flash flood susceptibility mapping considering rainfall extremes in the northeast region of Bangladesh. Adv. Space Res. 75(2), 1990–2017 (2025).

Google Scholar 

Prasad, P. et al. Threshold-based inventory for flood susceptibility assessment of the world’s largest river island using multi-temporal SAR data and ensemble machine learning algorithms. Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 39(1), 251–269 (2025).

Google Scholar 

Gholami, H. et al. Mapping flood risk using a workflow including deep learning and MCDM–Application to southern Iran. Urban Climate 59, 102272 (2025).

Google Scholar 

Li, G., et al., Urban Flood Hazard Assessment Based on Machine Learning Model. Water Resources Management, 2025: p. 1–18.

Norallahi, M. & Seyed Kaboli, H. Urban flood hazard mapping using machine learning models: GARP, RF, MaxEnt and NB. Nat. Hazards 106, 119–137 (2021).

Google Scholar 

Singha, C. et al. Spatial analysis of flood hazard zoning map using novel hybrid machine learning technique in Assam, India. Remote Sens. 14(24), 6229 (2022).

Google Scholar 

Wei, Q. et al. City scale urban flooding risk assessment using multi-source data and machine learning approach. J. Hydrol. 651, 132626 (2025).

Google Scholar 

Tellman, B. et al. Satellite imaging reveals increased proportion of population exposed to floods. Nature 596(7870), 80–86 (2021).

Google Scholar 

Jancewicz, K., Migoń, P. & Kasprzak, M. Connectivity patterns in contrasting types of tableland sandstone relief revealed by Topographic Wetness Index. Sci. Total Environ. 656, 1046–1062 (2019).

Google Scholar 

Moore, I. & Burch, G. Sediment transport capacity of sheet and rill flow: Application of unit stream power theory. Water Resour. Res. 22(8), 1350–1360 (1986).

Google Scholar 

Ndiaye, E., et al. Safe grid search with optimal complexity. in International conference on machine learning. 2019. PMLR.

Liashchynskyi, P. and P. Liashchynskyi, Grid search, random search, genetic algorithm: a big comparison for NAS. arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.06059, 2019.

Muzayanah, R. et al. Comparison of GridSearchCV and Bayesian hyperparameter optimization in random forest algorithm for diabetes prediction. J. Soft Comput. Explorat. 5(1), 86–91 (2024).

Google Scholar 

Shelke, M. S., Deshmukh, P. R. & Shandilya, V. K. A review on imbalanced data handling using undersampling and oversampling technique. Int. J. Recent Trends Eng. Res. 3(4), 444–449 (2017).

Google Scholar 

Mohammed, R., J. Rawashdeh, and M. Abdullah. Machine learning with oversampling and undersampling techniques: overview study and experimental results. in 2020 11th international conference on information and communication systems (ICICS). 2020. IEEE.

Mujahid, M. et al. Data oversampling and imbalanced datasets: An investigation of performance for machine learning and feature engineering. J. Big Data 11(1), 87 (2024).

Google Scholar 

Abascal, E. et al. Global diagnosis of nitrate pollution in groundwater and review of removal technologies. Sci. Total Environ. 810, 152233 (2022).

Google Scholar 

Chen, T., XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System. Cornell University, 2016.

Niazkar, M. et al. Applications of XGBoost in water resources engineering: A systematic literature review (Dec 2018–May 2023). Environ. Model. Softw. 174, 105971 (2024).

Google Scholar 

Quinlan, J. R. Induction of decision trees. Mach. Learn. 1, 81–106 (1986).

Google Scholar 

Costache, R. et al. Flood hazard potential evaluation using decision tree state-of-the-art models. Risk Anal. 44(2), 439–458 (2024).

Google Scholar 

Breiman, L. Random Forests. Mach. Learn. 45, 5–32 (2001).

Google Scholar 

Esfandiari, M. et al. Flood hazard risk mapping using a pseudo supervised random forest. Remote Sens. 12(19), 3206 (2020).

Google Scholar 

Ke, G., et al., Lightgbm: A highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree. Advances in neural information processing systems, 2017. 30.

Myers, R. H. & Montgomery, D. C. A tutorial on generalized linear models. J. Qual. Technol. 29(3), 274–291 (1997).

Google Scholar 

Hastie, T. J. & Pregibon, D. Generalized linear models. In Statistical models in S 195–247 (Routledge, 2017).

Google Scholar 

Clarke, R. T. Estimating time trends in Gumbel‐distributed data by means of generalized linear models. Water Resour. Res. 38(7), 16-1–16-11 (2002).

Google Scholar 

Akshitha, K. and M.V. Anand. Flood Prediction System with Voting Classifier. in 2024 2nd International Conference on Device Intelligence, Computing and Communication Technologies (DICCT). 2024. IEEE.

Prasad, P. et al. Novel ensemble machine learning models in flood susceptibility mapping. Geocarto Int. 37(16), 4571–4593 (2022).

Google Scholar 

Bernhofen, M. V. et al. The role of global data sets for riverine flood risk management at national scales. Water Resour. Res. 58(4), e2021WR031555 (2022).

Google Scholar 

Najibi, N. & Devineni, N. Recent trends in the frequency and duration of global floods. Earth Syst. Dyn. 9(2), 757–783 (2018).

Google Scholar 

Wu, H. et al. A new global landslide dam database (RAGLAD) and analysis utilizing auxiliary global fluvial datasets. Landslides 19(3), 555–572 (2022).

Google Scholar 

Khemani, M. et al. Characterizing the number and nature of historical floods and implications for exposure characterization in New England, 2000–2018. Environ. Res.: Health 3(3), 035003 (2025).

Google Scholar 

Xiao, C. et al. Flood evolution in the past 60 years revealed by reconstructed daily terrestrial water storage anomalies in China. Water Resour. Res. 61(9), e2024WR038712 (2025).

Google Scholar 

Singh, H. & Mohanty, M. P. Performance of ERA5 products in capturing pluvial and fluvial inundation: A statistical-cum-hydrodynamic framework for resource-constrained large flood-prone watersheds. Water Resour. Manage. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-025-04257-9 (2025).

Google Scholar 

Breiman, L., Classification and regression trees. Wadsworth International Group, 1984.

De’ath, G. & Fabricius, K. E. Classification and regression trees: A powerful yet simple technique for ecological data analysis. Ecology 81(11), 3178–3192 (2000).

Google Scholar 

Feng, Q. et al. Flood mapping based on multiple endmember spectral mixture analysis and random forest classifier—The case of Yuyao. China. Remote Sensing 7(9), 12539–12562 (2015).

Google Scholar 

Chen, W. et al. Modeling flood susceptibility using data-driven approaches of naïve bayes tree, alternating decision tree, and random forest methods. Sci. Total Environ. 701, 134979 (2020).

Google Scholar 

Lee, S. et al. Spatial prediction of flood susceptibility using random-forest and boosted-tree models in Seoul metropolitan city, Korea. Geomat. Nat. Hazards Risk 8(2), 1185–1203 (2017).

Google Scholar 

Zhu, Z. and Y. Zhang, Flood disaster risk assessment based on random forest algorithm. Neural Computing and Applications, 2022: p. 1–13.

Abedi, R. et al. Flash-flood susceptibility mapping based on XGBoost, random forest and boosted regression trees. Geocarto Int. 37(19), 5479–5496 (2022).

Google Scholar 

Geetha, P. & Madhu, D. Flood susceptibility map of Periyar River basin using geo-spatial technology and machine learning approach. Remote Sens. Earth Syst. Sci. 8(1), 1–21 (2025).

Google Scholar 

Ahmadianfar, I. et al. INFO: An efficient optimization algorithm based on weighted mean of vectors. Expert Syst. Appl. 195, 116516 (2022).

Google Scholar 

Ahmadianfar, I., Bozorg-Haddad, O. & Chu, X. Gradient-based optimizer: A new metaheuristic optimization algorithm. Inf. Sci. 540, 131–159 (2020).

Google Scholar 

Malekmohammadi, B., et al. An Approach for IoT-Based Smart Sensors Placement in Urban Water Networks Under Natural Hazards. in EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts. 2025.

Karimi Firozjaei, M., et al. Enhancing Spatial Resolution and Accuracy of Land Surface Temperature: Integration of Regression-based and Surface Energy Balance Models. in EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts. 2025.