• Scott Stanford, M. et al. Evaluating student and faculty outcomes for a Real-World capstone project with sustainability considerations. J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract. 139, 123–133 (2013).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Dym, C. L., Little, P., Orwin, E. J. & Spjut, E. Engineering Design: A Project-Based Introduction (Wiley, 2009).

  • Christie, M. & de Graaff, E. The philosophical and pedagogical underpinnings of active learning in engineering education. Eur. J. Eng. Educ. 42, 5–16 (2017).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Hernández-de-Menéndez, M., Guevara, V., Tudón Martínez, A., Hernández Alcántara, J. C., Morales-Menendez, R. & D. & Active learning in engineering education. A review of fundamentals, best practices and experiences. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. (IJIDeM). 13, 909–922 (2019).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Van den Beemt, A. et al. Interdisciplinary engineering education: A review of vision, teaching, and support. J. Eng. Educ. 109, 508–555 (2020).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Fridley, K. J., Hains, D. B., Nolen, L., Barry, B. E. & Hartmann, B. L. American Society for Engineering Education, Columbus, Ohio,. Is it time for a third edition of the civil engineering body of knowledge (BOK)? in 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (2017).

  • Brandes, H., Flicker, E. & Dooley, K. The Role of the Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge in ASCE’s Raise the Bar Effort. in 126th Annual Conference & Exposition (ed. American Society for Engineering Education (ASCE)) (American Society for Engineering Education (ASCE), 2019).

  • Forcael, E., Garcés, G., Backhouse, P. & Bastías, E. How do we teach? A practical guide for engineering educators. Int. J. Eng. Educ. 34 (2018).

  • Forcael, E., Garcés, G., Bastías, E. & Friz, M. Theory of teaching techniques used in civil engineering programs. J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract. 145 (2019).

  • García-Alvarado, R., Forcael, E. & Pulido-Arcas, J. A. Evaluation of extreme collaboration with Bim modeling for the teaching of Building projects. Arquitectura Revista. 16, 137–153 (2020).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Kunz, J. & Fischer, M. Virtual design and construction. Constr. Manage. Econ. 38, 355–363 (2020).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Schlusche, C., Schnaubert, L. & Bodemer, D. Competence in (meta-)cognitive learning strategies during help-seeking to overcome knowledge-related difficulties. Act. Learn. High Educ. 146978742311683 https://doi.org/10.1177/14697874231168343 (2023).

  • Jara, C., Alarcón, L. F. & Mourgues, C. Accelerating Interactions in Project Design through Extreme Collaboration and Commitment Management–A Case Study. in Proceedings for the 17th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction 477–488 (IGLC, 2009).

  • Borrego, M., Foster, M. J. & Froyd, J. E. Systematic literature reviews in engineering education and other developing interdisciplinary fields. J. Eng. Educ. 103, 45–76 (2014).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Borrego, M., Douglas, E. P. & Amelink, C. T. Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed research methods in engineering education. J. Eng. Educ. 98, 53–66 (2009).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Prince, M. J. & Felder, R. M. Inductive teaching and learning methods: definitions, comparisons, and research bases. J. Eng. Educ. 95, 123–138 (2006).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Pasya, I., Al-Junid, S. A. M. & Buniyamin, N. Overview of Capstone Project implementation in the Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia. in IEEE 7th International Conference on Engineering Education (ICEED) 95–99 (IEEE, 2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEED.2015.7451500

  • García, P. We must retrain engineers for the 21st century – here’s how. World Economic Forum (2019). https://www.weforum.org/stories/2019/02/how-to-train-21st-century-engineers-for-tech-discoveries/

  • Heydari, M., Shojaei, A. & Rokooei, S. Empowering the next generation: Transformative impact of faculty development programs in construction management and engineering. Proceedings of International Structural Engineering and Construction 11 (2024).

  • Wu, W. & Issa, R. R. A. BIM education and recruiting: Survey-Based comparative analysis of issues, perceptions, and collaboration opportunities. J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Practice 140 (2014).

  • Jiang, F., Ma, L., Broyd, T. & Chen, K. Digital twin and its implementations in the civil engineering sector. Autom. Constr. 130, 103838 (2021).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Chan, P. W. & Raisanen, C. Imagining a sustainable future: shaping emergent thinking by reflecting through aesthetic action. Eng. Project Organ. J. 7, 83–98 (2017).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Russell, J. S. & Stouffer, W. B. Survey of the National civil engineering curriculum. J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract. 131, 118–128 (2005).


    Google Scholar
     

  • ABET. Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2022–2023 (2023). https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2022-2023/

  • Taheri, S., Gutierrez, R., Zeng, Y. & Marsden, C. Effectiveness of student learning in an aerospace engineering capstone project: investigation of assessment methods. in Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA) Conference 1–7 (CEEA/ACEG, 2017).

  • de Ribeiro, L. R., Mizukami, M. & C. & Da G. N. Student assessment of a Problem-Based learning experiment in civil engineering education. J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract. 131, 13–18 (2005).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Terrón-López, M. J. et al. Implementation of a project-based engineering school: increasing student motivation and relevant learning. Eur. J. Eng. Educ. 42, 618–631 (2017).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Johri, A. & Olds, B. M. Situated engineering learning: bridging engineering education research and the learning sciences. J. Eng. Educ. 100, 151–185 (2011).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Labossière, P. & Roy, N. Original concept for a civil engineering capstone project. J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract. 141, 05014001 (2015).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Wilbarger, J. & Howe, S. Current Practices in Engineering Capstone Education: Further Results from a 2005 Nationwide Survey. in Proceedings. Frontiers in Education. 36th Annual Conference 5–10 (IEEE, 2006). https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2006.322616

  • Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge 3 Task Committee. Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge: Preparing the Future Civil Engineer (American Society of Civil Engineers, 2019). https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784415221

  • Biney, P. & Assessing, A. B. E. T. Outcomes Using Capstone Design Courses. in ASEE National Conference and Exposition 12.261-1–12.261-20 (ASEE, 2007).

  • Todd, R. H., Magleby, S. P., Sorensen, C. D., Swan, B. R. & Anthony, D. K. A survey of capstone engineering courses in North America. J. Eng. Educ. 84, 165–174 (1995).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Dougherty, J. U. & Parfitt, M. K. Framework for teaching engineering capstone design courses with emphasis on application of Internet-Based technologies. J. Archit. Eng. 15, 4–9 (2009).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Hotaling, N., Fasse, B. B., Bost, L. F., Hermann, C. D. & Forest, C. R. A quantitative analysis of the effects of a multidisciplinary engineering capstone design course. J. Eng. Educ. 101, 630–656 (2012).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Gu, N. & London, K. Understanding and facilitating BIM adoption in the AEC industry. Autom. Constr. 19, 988–999 (2010).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Chachere, J., Levitt, R. & Kunz, J. Can You Accelerate Your Project Using Extreme Collaboration? A Model Based Analysis (2003).

  • Erdogan, B., Anumba, C. J., Bouchlaghem, D. & Nielsen, Y. Collaboration environments for construction: implementation case studies. J. Manag. Eng. 24, 234–244 (2008).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Retamal, F., Salazar, L. A. & Alarcón, L. F. Online monitoring and implementation of commitment management performance and its impact on project planning in four construction projects. J. Constr. Eng. Manag 148 (2022).

  • Kunz, J. & Fischer, M. Virtual Design and Construction: Themes, Case Studies and Implementation Suggestions (2012). https://purl.stanford.edu/gg301vb3551

  • Fruchter, R. Transformative 3D Immersive Collaboration Environment in Support of AEC Global Teamwork. in Computing in Civil and Building Engineering () 1425–1432 (American Society of Civil Engineers, 2014). https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784413616.177

  • Mark, G. Extreme collaboration. Commun. ACM. 45, 89–93 (2002).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Garcia, A. C. B., Kunz, J., Ekstrom, M. & Kiviniemi, A. Building a project ontology with extreme collaboration and virtual design and construction. Adv. Eng. Inform. 18, 71–83 (2004).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhang, S., Teizer, J., Lee, J. K., Eastman, C. M. & Venugopal, M. Building information modeling (BIM) and safety: automatic safety checking of construction models and schedules. Autom. Constr. 29, 183–195 (2013).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chachere, J., Kunz, J. & Levitt, R. Observation, Theory, and Simulation of Integrated Concurrent Engineering: Risk Analysis Using Formal Models of Radical Project Acceleration (2004).

  • Becerik-Gerber, B., Jazizadeh, F., Li, N. & Calis, G. Application areas and data requirements for BIM-Enabled facilities management. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 138, 431–442 (2012).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Kunz, J., Levitt, R. & Fischer, M. Management and Leadership Education for Civil Engineers: Teaching Virtual Design and Construction for Sustainability (2003).

  • Forcael, E. et al. Behavior and performance of BIM users in a collaborative work environment. Appl. Sci. 10, 2199 (2020).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Shuman, L. J., Besterfield-Sacre, M. & McGourty, J. The ABET professional Skills – Can they be taught?? Can they be assessed?? J. Eng. Educ. 94, 41–55 (2005).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Crawley, E., Malmqvist, J., Lucas, W. A. & Brodeur, D. R. The CDIO syllabus v2.0., an updated statement of goals for engineering education. in Proceedings of the 7th International CDIO Conference (Technical University of Denmark, 2011).

  • Graaf de, E., Saunders-Smits, G. & Nieweg, M. Research and practice of active learning in engineering education. Res. Pract. Act. Learn. Eng. Educ. https://doi.org/10.5117/9789085550914 (2005).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Oudshoorn, M. J., Thomas, S., Raj, R. K. & Parrish, A. Understanding the New ABET Computer Science Criteria. in Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education 429–434B (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3159450.3159534

  • Cropley, D. H. Promoting creativity and innovation in engineering education. Psychol. Aesthet. Creat Arts. 9, 161–171 (2015).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Johnson, B., Ulseth, R., Smith, C. & Fox, D. The impacts of project based learning on self-directed learning and professional skill attainment: A comparison of project based learning to traditional engineering education. in IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) 1–5 (IEEE, 2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2015.7344028

  • Estes, A. C., Brady, P. A. & Laursen, P. Adjusting to the New ABET Criteria 3 and 5: It’s Really Not Very Hard. in 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (2018).

  • Edström, K. & Kolmos, A. PBL and CDIO: complementary models for engineering education development. Eur. J. Eng. Educ. 39, 539–555 (2014).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhang, J., Wu, R. A. & Study of Undergraduate Engineering Management Education Reform Using CDIO Engineering Education Model. In ICCREM 2018: Construction Enterprises and Project Management 284–290 (American Society of Civil Engineers, 2018).

  • Xin, P., Liu, D., Mi, H. P. L. C. & Teaching Reform and Practice Based On CDIO Engineering Education Mode. in International Conference on Modern Management, Education Technology, and Social Science (MMETSS) 129–132 (Atlantis Press, 2016).

  • Jianzhong, Z. On CDIO model under learning by doing strategy. Res. High. Educ. 3, 1–6 (2008).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Crawley, E. F., Malmqvist, J., Östlund, S., Brodeur, D. R. & Edström, K. Rethinking Engineering Education: the CDIO Approach. Rethinking Engineering Education: the CDIO Approach (Springer International Publishing, 2014).

  • Forcael, E., Garcés, G. & Orozco, F. Relationship between professional competencies required by engineering students according to ABET and CDIO and Teaching-Learning techniques. IEEE Trans. Educ. 65, 46–55 (2022).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Malmqvist, J. et al. CDIO Initiative, Reykjavik, Iceland,. The CDIO Syllabus 3.0 – An updated statement of goals. in Proceedings of the International CDIO Conference 2022 18–36 (2022).

  • CDIO. History of the Worldwide CDIO Initiative. http://www.cdio.org/cdio-history (2024).

  • U.S. Department of Energy. Solar Decathlon (2023). https://www.solardecathlon.gov/

  • Krogsbøll, A. et al. CDIO projects In civil engineering study program at DTU. in Proceedings of the 7th International CDIO Conference 1–11 (CDIO Initiative, 2017).

  • Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H. & Krathwohl, D. R. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: the Classification of Educational Goals: Handbook I, Cognitive Domain (Longmans, 1956).

  • Zhang, L., Long, Z., Cai, J. & Fang, J. Light Weight Optimization Design for a Connection Frame Considering Thermal-Structural Coupling Deformation. in ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition 1–9 (American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Montreal, Canada, 2014). 1–9 (American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Montreal, Canada, 2014). (2014). https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2014-39661

  • Jackson, H. V. & Tarhini, K. M. Progressive integration of design process into civil engineering curriculum. J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract. 142, 05015006 (2016).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Li, R., Lund, A. & Nordsteien, A. The link between flipped and active learning: a scoping review. Teach. High. Educ. 28, 1993–2027 (2023).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Marzano, R. J. & Kendall, J. S. The New Taxonomy of Educational Objectives (Corwin, 2007).

  • Mat Isa, C. M., Mustaffa, N. K., Joseph, E. O. & Preece, C. N. Development of psychomotor skill and programme outcome attainment of civil engineering students in Malaysia. Asian J. Vocat. Educ. Humanit. 1, 9–24 (2020).


    Google Scholar
     

  • McBride, R. E., Gabbard, C. C. & Miller, G. Teaching critical thinking skills in the psychomotor domain. Clearing House: J. Educational Strategies Issues Ideas. 63, 197–201 (1990).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Jung, Y., Kim, H. & Kim, N. Virtual Plan-Design-Build for capstone projects in the school of architecture: CM & BIM studios in Five-Year b.arch. Program. J. Asian Archit. Building Eng. 15, 279–286 (2016).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Retherford, J. Q. & Amoah, J. K. Incorporating ASCE ’ s ExCEEd Principles in Capstone Project and Other Active Learning Courses (2014).

  • Oswald Beiler, M. R. Integrating innovation and entrepreneurship principles into the civil engineering curriculum. J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract. 141, 04014014 (2015).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Dancz, C. L. et al. Utilizing civil engineering senior design capstone projects to evaluate students’ sustainability education across engineering curriculum. Adv. Eng. Educ. 6, 1–27 (2017).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Becerik-Gerber, B. Ku, K. b c & Jazizadeh, F. a. BIM-enabled virtual and collaborative construction engineering and management. J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract. 138, 234–245 (2012).

  • Andersen, D. a. Civil engineering capstone design course. J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract. 118, 279–283 (1992).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Padmanabhan, G., Katti, D., Khan, E. & Peloubet, F. & Leelaruban, N. A unique civil engineering capstone design course. Int. J. Eng. Pedagogy 8 (2018).

  • Hanna, A. S. & Sullivan, K. T. Bridging the gap between academics and practice: A capstone design experience. J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract. 131, 59–62 (2005).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Gnanapragasam, N. Industrially sponsored senior capstone experience: program implementation and assessment. J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract. 134, 257–262 (2008).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Gavin, K. Case study of a project-based learning course in civil engineering design. Eur. J. Eng. Educ. 36, 547–558 (2011).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Yost, S. A. & Lane, D. R. Implementing a Problem-Based Multi- Disciplinary Civil Engineering Design Capstone: Evolution, Assessment and Lessons Learned with Industry Partners (2007).

  • Berselli, G., Bilancia, P. & Luzi, L. Project-based learning of advanced CAD/CAE tools in engineering education. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. (IJIDeM). 14, 1071–1083 (2020).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Patching, A., Skitmore, M., Rusch, R. & Lester, D. Case study of the collaborative design of an integrated BIM, IPD and lean university education program. Int. J. Constr. Manage. 24, 799–808 (2024).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhang, J. et al. Toward next-generation engineering education: A case study of an engineering capstone project based on BIM technology in MEP systems. Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ. cae.22448 https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22448 (2021).

  • Garcés, G. & Bastías, E. Modelo de competencias Para El Aprendizaje online En educación superior: Un análisis bibliométrico y revisión Sistemática. RIED-Revista Iberoamericana De Educación Distancia 28 (2025).

  • Araújo, F. P. & Palmeirão, C. ERASMUS+: A study of the path of pedagogical innovation practices. Cadernos De Pesquisa. 53, 1–15 (2023).

  • Jain, N. Survey versus interviews: comparing data collection tools for exploratory research. Qualitative Rep. 26, 541–554 (2021).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Wang, J., Yang, N. & Guo, M. Ego-network stability and exploratory innovation: the moderating role of knowledge networks. Manag. Decis. 59, 1406–1420 (2021).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Svongoro, P. & Kufakunesu, P. Some methodological issues in Language research: dealing with transcribed interpreted courtroom data. Forum Linguistic Stud. 5, 1–14 (2024).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Mazur, M. & Manley, E. Exploratory models in a time of big data. Interdisc. Sci. Rev. 41, 366–382 (2016).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Luo, Y. & Hyatt, B. A. Capstone Course Design in Construction Management. in Construction Research Congress 2020 651–659American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, (2020). https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784482872.071

  • Tijo-Lopez, S., Mejía, G. & Portilla-Carreño, O. Inclusion of BIM and Sustainability in Construction Education through Capstone Design Projects. in Construction Research Congress 2024 315–324 (American Society of Civil Engineers, 2024). https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784485293.032

  • Pimmel, R. Cooperative learning instructional activities in a capstone design course. J. Eng. Educ. 90, 413–421 (2001).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Vanhanen, J., Lehtinen, T. O. A. & Lassenius, C. Software engineering problems and their relationship to perceived learning and customer satisfaction on a software capstone project. J. Syst. Softw. 137, 50–66 (2018).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Leu, L. J. & Liu, M. Summary of developments in the civil engineering capstone course in Taiwan. in International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL) 1079–1083 (IEEE, 2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICL.2015.7318181

  • Alele, F. & Malau-Aduli, B. An Introduction To Research Methods for Undergraduate Health Profession Students (James Cook University, 2023).

  • Meléndez, W., Saavedra, R. & Garcés, G. Quantity Take-Off in Rough Construction of High-Rise Buildings Based on CAD and BIM Methodologies: A Case Study. in Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC 32) 793–806 (2024). https://doi.org/10.24928/2024/0236

  • Wang, L., Huang, M., Zhang, X., Jin, R. & Yang, T. Review of BIM adoption in the higher education of AEC disciplines. J. Civ. Eng. Educ. 146 (2020).

  • Ren, R. & Zhang, J. A. New framework to address BIM interoperability in the AEC domain from technical and process dimensions. Adv. Civil Eng. 2021, 1–17 (2021).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sanchez-Lite, A., Zulueta, P., Sampaio, A. Z. & Gonzalez-Gaya, C. BIM for the realization of sustainable digital models in a University-Business collaborative learning environment: assessment of use and students’ perception. Buildings 12, 971 (2022).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Obi, L. I., Omotayo, T., Ekundayo, D. & Oyetunji, A. K. Enhancing BIM competencies of built environment undergraduates students using a problem-based learning and network analysis approach. Smart Sustainable Built Environ. 13, 217–238 (2024).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Garcés, G. & Peña, C. Adapting engineering education to BIM and industry 4.0: A view from kolb’s experiential theory in the laboratory. Ingeniare Revista Chil. De Ingeniería. 30, 497–512 (2022).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhang, J., Zhao, C., Li, H., Huijser, H. & Skitmore, M. Exploring an interdisciplinary BIM-Based joint capstone course in highway engineering. J. Civ. Eng. Educ. 146 (2020).

  • Mills, J. E. & Treagust, D. F. Engineering education—Is problem-based or project-based learning the answer. Australasian J. Eng. Educ. 3, 2–16 (2003).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Jonassen, D., Strobel, J. & Lee, C. B. Everyday problem solving in engineering: lessons for engineering educators. J. Eng. Educ. 95, 139–151 (2006).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Forcael, E., Garcés, G. & Lantada, A. Convergence of Educational Paradigms into Engineering Education 5.0. in 2023 World Engineering Education Forum – Global Engineering Deans Council (WEEF-GEDC) 1–8 (IEEE, 2023). https://doi.org/10.1109/WEEF-GEDC59520.2023.10344026

  • Sharunova, A., Wang, Y., Kowalski, M. & Qureshi, A. J. Applying bloom’s taxonomy in transdisciplinary engineering design education. Int. J. Technol. Des. Educ. 32, 987–999 (2022).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Amamou, S. & Cheniti-Belcadhi, L. Tutoring in Project-Based learning. Procedia Comput. Sci. 126, 176–185 (2018).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Kolmos, A. & de Graaff, E. Problem-based and project-based learning in engineering education. in Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research 141–161 (Cambridge University Press, 2014).



  • Source link