• Zhao, X., Chen, Q., Zhang, H., Chen, P. & Chen, S. A study on the influencing factors of corporate digital transformation: empirical evidence from Chinese listed companies. Sci. Rep. 14, 6243 (2024).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhang, L., Li, Y., Pan, Y. & Ding, L. Advanced informatic technologies for intelligent construction: A review. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 137, 109104 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Thomas, H., Christian, M., Alexander, B. & Florian, W. Options for formulating a digital transformation strategy. MIS Q. Exec. 15, 1–2 (2016).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhang, S., Zhang, F., Xue, B., Wang, D. & Liu, B. Unpacking resilience of project organizations: a capability-based conceptualization and measurement of project resilience. Int. J. Project Manage. 41, 102541 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Winch, G. M. Three domains of project organising. Int. J. Project Manage. 32, 721–731 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Leiringer, R. & Zhang, S. Organisational capabilities and project organising research. Int. J. Proj Manag. 39, 422–436 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Munianday, P., Radzi, A. R., Esa, M. & Rahman, R. A. Optimal strategies for improving organizational BIM capabilities: PLS-SEM approach. J. Manag. Eng. 38, 04022015 (2022).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Feng, P. Research on organizational evolution in the big data era. Economist 3, 57–62 (2018).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Ahuja, G., Coff, R. W. & Lee, P. M. Managerial foresight and attempted rent appropriation: insider trading on knowledge of imminent breakthroughs. Strateg Manage. J. 26, 791–808 (2005).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Eggers, J. P. & Kaplan, S. Cognition and capabilities: A multi-level perspective. Acad. Manag Ann. 7, 295–340 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Liu, S., Wu, Z. & Xv, Q. Mechanism of performance feedback on capability reconfiguration. Syst. Engineering-Theory Pract. 36, 2853–2866 (2016).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lewin, A. Y., Long, C. P. & Carroll, T. N. The Coevolution of new organizational forms. Organ. Sci. 10, 535–550 (1999).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Luo, L., Zhang, L., Zheng, X. & Wu, G. A hybrid approach for investigating impacts of leadership dynamics on project performance. Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 29, 1965–1990 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lin, M., Ren, Y., Feng, C. & Li, X. Analyzing resilience influencing factors in the prefabricated Building supply chain based on SEM-SD methodology. Sci. Rep. 14, 17393 (2024).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wasserman, M. E., Pagell, M. & Bechtel, C. Resources and capabilities for sustainable competitive advantage: Cross-functional perspective. Am. J. Bus. 14, 23–32 (1999).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wong, D. T. W. & Ngai, E. W. T. The effects of analytics capability and sensing capability on operations performance: the moderating role of data-driven culture. Ann. Oper. Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-023-05241-5 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Teece, D. J. Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strateg Manage. J. 28, 1319–1350 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jifri, A. O., Drnevich, P., Jackson, W. & Dulek, R. Examining the sustainability of contributions of competing core organizational capabilities in response to systemic economic crises. Sustainability 15, 4526 (2023).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Davies, A. & Brady, T. Explicating the dynamics of project capabilities. Int. J. Project Manage. 34, 314–327 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Grant, R. M. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strateg Manag J. 17, 109–122 (1996).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tana, S., Breidbach, C. & Burton-Jones, A. Digital transformation as collective social action. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 24, 1618–1644 (2023).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Reineholm, C., Lundqvist, D. & Wallo, A. Change competence: an integrative literature review. Work (Reading Mass). 79, 569–584 (2024).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Collis, D. J. Research note: how valuable are organizational capabilities? Strateg Manage. J. 15, 143–152 (1994).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Elazhary, M., Popovič, A., Henrique de Souza Bermejo, P. & Oliveira, T. How information technology governance influences organizational agility: the role of market turbulence. Inf. Syst. Manage. 40, 148–168 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Johari, S. & Hendra, S. An overview of digital leadership dimensions in construction industry. Int. J. Bus. Technol. Manage. 5, 49–66 (2023).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Chen, Y., Wei, S. & Ding, C. Analysis of element characteristics of construction project organizational capability in digital construction mode. Project Manage. Technol. 22, 22–27 (2024).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Chen, Y., Qiu, W. & Xiao, M. Influence mechanisms of digital construction organizations’ capabilities on performance: evidence from SEM and FsQCA. Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. ahead-of-print, (2025).

  • Hu, Y. et al. Improving megasite management performance through incentives: lessons learned from the Shanghai expo construction. J. Manage. Eng. 28, 330–337 (2012).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zerjav, V., Edkins, A. & Davies, A. Project capabilities for operational outcomes in inter-organisational settings: the case of London Heathrow terminal 2. Int. J. Project Manage. 36, 444–459 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhang, X. et al. Deconstructing organizational capabilities of megaproject owners: dimensions and levels. J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 149, 4023055 (2023).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hu, Q., Chen, Y., Gao, L. & Ding, C. Construction project organizational capabilities antecedent model construction based on digital construction context. Buildings 14, 3471 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Li, Z., Yang, C., Yang, Z. & Zhao, Y. The impact of middle managers’ digital leadership on employee work engagement. Front. Psychol. 15, 1368442 (2024).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Banks, G. C., Dionne, S. D., Mast, M. S. & Sayama, H. Leadership in the digital era: A review of who, what, when, where, and why. Leadersh. Q. 33, 101634 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yang, X., Wu, D. & Zheng, Z. Research on the relationship between construction 4.0 and construction firm’s performance: Based on the mediating role of technological innovation capability. Math. Probl. Eng. 2022, 8523480 (2022).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Li, L., Zhu, W., Wei, L. & Yang, S. How can digital collaboration capability boost service innovation? Evidence from the information technology industry. Technol. Forecast. Soc. 182, 121830 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hrebiniak, L. G. & Joyce, W. F. Organizational adaptation: strategic choice and environmental determinism. Adm. Sci. Q. 30, 336 (1985).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wang, X., Li, Q. & Xiang, B. Theoretic and empirical study on engines of strategic renewal:agents and their roles. Science & Technol. Progress Policy 111–116 (2008).

  • Helfat, C. E. & Peteraf, M. A. The dynamic resource-based view: capability lifecycles. Strateg Manag J. 24, 997–1010 (2003).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Peng, H., Yang, X. & Wu, S. Impact of capital network embeddedness on the dynamic capabilities of international entrepreneurial firms: the moderating role of risk appetite. Sci. Technol. Progress Policy. 41, 89–98 (2024).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Karl, S. R. & Warner Maximilian Wäger. Building dynamic capabilities for digital transformation: an ongoing process of strategic renewal. Long. Range Plann. 52, 326–349 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Aghimien, D. et al. Dynamic capabilities for digitalisation in the AECO sector – a scientometric review. Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 29, 1585–1608 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hou, E., Zhang, T., Yin, X., Chen, J. & Ding, Y. The evolution of digitalization capabilities during strategic renewal: A case study based on the ecological restoration enterprise practice. J. Clean. Prod. 459, 142570 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Arici, T. & Gok, M. S. Examining environmental turbulence intensity: A strategic agility and innovativeness approach on firm performance in environmental turbulence situations. Sustainability 15, 5364 (2023).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sun, B. & Ju, Z. Seeking the possible path of technological breakthrough from technology lock-in discrimination: A case study of semiconductor photolithography industry. Stud. Sci. Sci. 43, 1–22 (2024).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kaganer, E., Gregory, R. & Sarker, S. A process for managing digital transformation: an organizational inertia perspective. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 24, 1005–1030 (2023).


    Google Scholar
     

  • de Rooij, D., Timen, A. & Raab, J. Adaptive organizational network response in a crisis: the case of five European airports during the COVID-19 pandemic. Public. Admin Rev. 84, 400–413 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mihailova, I. & Svystunova, L. An agency perspective on organizational responses to institutions: A problematizing review of emerging market firms’ responses. J. Bus. Res. 186, 114975 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Connelly, B. L. & Shi, W. Threats and responses in organizational research. J. Manage. 48, 1366–1381 (2022).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Li, X., Qian, J. & Sun, R. Organizational inertia in digital transformation: the role of top managers’ cognition. J. Manage. Sci. China. 26, 81–101 (2023).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Bergh, D. D., D’Oria, L., Crook, T. R. & Roccapriore, A. Is knowledge really the most important strategic resource? A meta-analytic review. Strateg Manage. J. 46, 3–18 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Modreanu, S. & Al, E. Knowledge – discovery or revelation?. Transdiscipl. J. Eng. Sci. https://doi.org/10.22545/2022/00179 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Katila, R., Ahuja, G. & Something Old Something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. AMJ 45, 1183–1194 (2002).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Engemann, K. J. & Miller, H. E. Toward revealing concealed risks for agile IT service management practices. Inf. Syst. E-bus Manag. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-023-00666-8 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Van Zeebroeck, N., Kretschmer, T. & Bughin, J. Digital is strategy: the role of digital technology adoption in strategy renewal. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 70, 3183–3197 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Deng, S. & Rui, M. A study on the frontiers of Micro-Cognitive mechanism of organizational capability evolution. Foreign Econ. Manage. 31, 38–44 (2009).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Lawrence, P. R. Organization and environment: managing differentiation and integration (Harvard Business School Press, 1986).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhang, J., Lin, X., Yang, L. & Yang, X. The impact mechanism of organizational sensemaking on enterprise digital transformation:the medium role of organizational ability. Sci. Sci. Manage. S T. 44, 47–66 (2023).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Akram, M. S., Goraya, M. A. S., Malik, A. & Aljarallah, A. M. Organizational performance and sustainability: exploring the roles of IT capabilities and knowledge management capabilities. Sustainability 10, 3816 (2018).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Shi, Q., Wang, Q., Guo, Z. & Guo, J. Collaborative innovation activities and BIM application on innovation capability in construction supply chain: mediating role of explicit and Tacit knowledge sharing. J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 147, 4021168 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Geng, X. & Chen, G. Research on factors of emergency management ability of coal mine enterprises based on Sem. Coal Eng. 53, 184–188 (2021).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Wang, D. & Wang, P. Effect of employee resilience on organizational resilience in construction projects: considering the role of project tasks. Engineering Construction and Architectural Management. ahead-of-print, (2023).

  • Wang, Y., Lo, H. P. & Yang, Y. The constituents of core competencies and firm performance: evidence from high-technology firms in China. J. Eng. Tech. Manage. 21, 249–280 (2004).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • He, Q., Chen, Z. & Li, Y. The influence of employee psychological ownership on project performance of major infrastructure projects in china: an intermediary based on employee organizational ownership behavior. J. Syst. Manage. 26, 54–62 (2017).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Wang, S., Lei, J. & Shao, Y. External search, absorptive capacity and firm breakthrough innovation performance: the moderating role of environmental volatility. Syst. Eng. 41, 35–48 (2023).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Peng, C., Zuo, P., Li, Y. & Zhang, M. Urban Multi-Risk Coupling and Resilient Responses Through Urban Planning. Urban Plann. Forum https://doi.org/10.16361/j.upf.202405012 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhao, H., Duoqian, M., Fuji, R. & Hongyun, Z. Rough set knowledge discovery based open domain Chinese question answering retrieval. J. Comput. Res. Dev. 55, 958–967 (2018).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Li, X. & Li, Z. Context-aware text matching algorithm for korean peninsula language knowledge base based on density clustering. Mob. Inf. Sys. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5775146 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kretschmer, T. & Symeou, P. C. Absorptive capacity components: performance effects in related and unrelated diversification. Long. Range Plann. 57, 102416 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Li, R., Fu, L. & Liu, Z. The Paradoxical effect of digital transformation on innovation performance: does risk-taking matter? IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 71, 3308–3324 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Stachowiak, A., Adamczak, M., Hadas, L., Domański, R. & Cyplik, P. Knowledge absorption capacity as a factor for increasing logistics 4.0 maturity. Appl. Sci. 9, 5365 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ansoff, H. I. Model of environmental turbulence. In Strategic Management (ed. Ansoff, H. I.) 47–71 (Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-02971-6_5.

    Chapter 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pelletier, C., L’Écuyer, F. & Raymond, L. Building organizational agility through digital transformation: A configurational approach in SMEs. Industrial Management & Data Systems. ahead-of-print, (2025).

  • Jiao, J. & Zhu, W. Research on the innovation path of venture capital empowering enterprises from the perspective of financial regulation. Credit Ref. 42, 71–79 (2024).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Kawiana, I. G. P. Digital leadership: Building adaptive organizations in the digital age. J. Multidisiplin Sahombu. 3, 170–179 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhang, Y., Gou, J. & He, S. Exploring the barriers and mitigation strategies in collaborative network development: A case study from equipment manufacturing company. In Collaborative Networks in Digitalization and Society 5.0 (eds Camarinha-Matos, L. M. et al.) 564–576 (Springer International Publishing, 2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14844-6_45.

    Chapter 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Johan, F., Jafri, M. Z., Lim, H. S. & Wan Maznah, W. O. Laboratory measurement: Chlorophyll-a concentration measurement with acetone method using spectrophotometer. in IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management. 744–748 (2014). 744–748, https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEM.2014.7058737(2014).

  • Wang, J. & Li, J. Design of large data knowledge processing model based on collaborative knowledge. Inform. Sci. 33, 140–142 (2015).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Awamleh, F. & Ertugan, A. The relationship between information technology capabilities, organizational intelligence, and competitive advantage. Sage Open. 11, 21582440211015201 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Li, Z., Wang, X. & Chen, X. Research on the influence effect and mechanism of government data opening on enterprise innovation. Sci. Res. Manage. 45, 11–20 (2024).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Ravichandran, T. Exploring the relationships between IT competence, innovation capacity and organizational agility. J. Strategic Inf. Syst. 27, 22–42 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lai, X., Chen, Y. & Fan, Y. Formation an evolution of data-driven dynamic capabilities. Stud. Sci. Sci. 41, 113–122 (2023).


    Google Scholar
     



  • Source link