Safe water tool nearly three times more effective than standard practice, new study finds - News@York
Directed acyclic graph identifying factors that could potentially influence household FRC in a typical refugee settlement water system. EC, electrical conductivity; FRC, free residual chlorine; SWOT, Safe Water Optimization Tool. Credit: BMJ Global Health (2025). DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-018631

A new study finds a dramatic increase in safe drinking water when a machine learning-enabled tool created by York University researchers is used to optimize chlorination levels in refugee camp water supplies. Lead author Syed Imran Ali says that the new study shows that the Safe Water Optimization Tool (SWOT) vastly outperforms status-quo guidelines for safe water supply in humanitarian response.

“Our research found that SWOT can deliver at nearly three times the rate as compared to standard practices, adding to a growing body of evidence that shows it to be a highly efficacious tool in a variety of situations,” says Ali, director of the Humanitarian Water Engineering Lab at the Dahdaleh Institute for Global Health Research and an adjunct professor at the Lassonde School of Engineering.

“With humanitarian work being undertaken in increasingly challenging conditions and the system under immense financial strain, the demand for evidence-based solutions like the SWOT is growing.”

For the study, published in BMJ Global Health, the researchers analyzed routinely collected water-quality data from an active humanitarian response at the Kutupalong-Balukhali refugee settlement in Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh where the SWOT had been implemented. They found that households following SWOT guidelines achieved safe water 90% of the time, compared to 35% with the status-quo universal guideline otherwise used in humanitarian response.

The study also found that in order for the intervention to have maximum impact, water monitoring teams and water treatment operations need to be integrated to find the optimized chlorination levels.

“The challenge is making sure that water system operators have the proper support to improve feedback between monitoring and .”

Other authors on the paper and fellow SWOT collaborators include machine learning lead Professor Usman T. Khan from Lassonde’s Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Health Associate Professor Tarra Penney, Ph.D. candidate Mike De Santi, former Dahdaleh director Dr. James Orbinski, SWOT technical advisor Matt Arnold, SWOT data science specialist Syed Saad Ali, and Jean-François Fesselet with the public health department at Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) Holland.

The SWOT is a free, online tool that Ali developed after working as a water and sanitation specialist in South Sudan with MSF. Ali and colleagues discovered that universal water chlorination guidelines used widely in the humanitarian sector were built on faulty assumptions. They worked on creating a tool with fellow York researchers and MSF to help aid workers generate site-specific and evidence-based chlorination levels in refugee camps using just routine monitoring data.

It has since helped provide safe water for more than 700,000 people globally. This includes recent collaborations in Yemen and Gaza, where Ali says there are extreme operational challenges, and Uganda, where Ali firsthand witnessed the effects of recent dramatic U.S. government cuts to the humanitarian sector.

“Basic humanitarian life support systems, across the world, are degrading very quickly and the sector is operating under extremely challenging conditions,” says Ali. “There’s a pressure now, with reduced resources, to ensure interventions are evidence-based and demonstrably effective, and that’s exactly what the SWOT does for safe water systems.”

More information:
Syed Imran Ali et al, Proof-of-concept evaluation at Cox’s Bazar of the Safe Water Optimization Tool: water quality modelling for safe water supply in humanitarian emergencies, BMJ Global Health (2025). DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-018631

Provided by
York University


Citation:
Safe water tool nearly three times more effective than standard practice, new study finds (2025, August 21)
retrieved 21 August 2025
from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2025-08-safe-tool-effective-standard.html

This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no
part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.





Source link