Wadud, Z., Adeel, M. & Anable, J. Understanding the large role of long-distance travel in carbon emissions from passenger travel. Nat. Energy 9, 1129–1138 (2024).
Axsen, J., Plötz, P. & Wolinetz, M. Crafting strong, integrated policy mixes for deep CO2 mitigation in road transport. Nat. Clim. Change 10, 809–818 (2020).
Böhm, M., Nanni, M. & Pappalardo, L. Gross polluters and vehicle emissions reduction. Nat. Sustain. 5, 699–707 (2022).
Fast Facts on Transportation Greenhouse Gas Emissions (US Environmental Protection Agency, 2022); https://www.epa.gov/greenvehicles/fast-facts-transportation-greenhouse-gas-emissions
Climate Change Mitigation: Reducing Emissions: Road Transport (European Environment Agency, 2024); https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/topics/in-depth/road-transport
Air Quality in Europe 2022 (European Environment Agency, 2022); https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/air-quality-in-europe-2022
Liang, X. et al. Air quality and health benefits from fleet electrification in China. Nat. Sustain. 2, 962–971 (2019).
Nunez, Y. et al. An environmental justice analysis of air pollution emissions in the United States from 1970 to 2010. Nat. Commun. 15, 268 (2024).
Testi, I. et al. Big mobility data reveals hyperlocal air pollution exposure disparities in the Bronx, New York. Nat. Cities 1, 512–521 (2024).
Gurney, K. R. et al. Under-reporting of greenhouse gas emissions in US cities. Nat. Commun. 12, 553 (2021).
City of New York Congestion pricing program. https://portal.311.nyc.gov/article/?kanumber=KA-03612 (2025).
Hu, S. et al. Evaluating the impact of zone 30 policies on citywide road traffic emissions and efficiency: a big data-driven approach. Transp. Res. A 202, 104705 (2025).
Deng, F. et al. A big data approach to improving the vehicle emission inventory in China. Nat. Commun. 11, 2801 (2020).
Wen, Y. et al. Mapping dynamic road emissions for a megacity by using open-access traffic congestion index data. Appl. Energy 260, 114357 (2020).
Yang, D. et al. High-resolution mapping of vehicle emissions of atmospheric pollutants based on large-scale, real-world traffic datasets. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 19, 8831–8843 (2019).
COPERT The Industry Standard Emissions Calculator (Emisia, 2024); https://copert.emisia.com/
Fung, P. L., Al-Jaghbeer, O., Pirjola, L., Aaltonen, H. & Järvi, L. Exploring the discrepancy between top-down and bottom-up approaches of fine spatio-temporal vehicular CO2 emission in an urban road network. Sci. Total Environ. 901, 165827 (2023).
Chen, G. et al. Review on city-level carbon accounting. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53, 5545–5558 (2019).
Gómez, C., González, C., Osses, M. & Aristizábal, B. Spatial and temporal disaggregation of the on-road vehicle emission inventory in a medium-sized Andean city. Comparison of GIS-based top-down methodologies. Atmos. Environ. 179, 142–155 (2018).
Zhou, X. et al. Integrating a simplified emission estimation model and mesoscopic dynamic traffic simulator to efficiently evaluate emission impacts of traffic management strategies. Transp. Res. D 37, 123–136 (2015).
Zhang, S. et al. Fine-grained vehicle emission management using intelligent transportation system data. Environ. Pollut. 241, 1027–1037 (2018).
EPA’s MOtor Vehicle Emission Simulator (MOVES) (US Environmental Protection Agency, 2024); https://www.epa.gov/moves
Xia, Y. et al. Future reductions of China’s transport emissions impacted by changing driving behaviour. Nat. Sustain. 6, 1228–1236 (2023).
Janež, M., Verovšek, Š, Zupančič, T. & Moškon, M. Citizen science for traffic monitoring: investigating the potentials for complementing traffic counters with crowdsourced data. Sustainability 14, 622 (2022).
Jiang, L. et al. Hyperfine-resolution mapping of on-road vehicle emissions with comprehensive traffic monitoring and an intelligent transportation system. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 21, 16985–17002 (2021).
Wang, A. et al. Capturing uncertainty in emission estimates related to vehicle electrification and implications for metropolitan greenhouse gas emission inventories. Appl. Energy 265, 114798 (2020).
Meneguzzer, C., Gastaldi, M., Rossi, R., Gecchele, G. & Prati, M. V. Comparison of exhaust emissions at intersections under traffic signal versus roundabout control using an instrumented vehicle. Transp. Res. Proc. 25, 1597–1609 (2017).
Wu, K. et al. Big-data empowered traffic signal control could reduce urban carbon emission. Nat. Commun. 16, 2013 (2025).
Jocher, G., Chaurasia, A. & Qiu, J. Ultralytics YOLO (version 8.0). GitHub https://github.com/ultralytics/ultralytics (2023).
Iqbal, M. S., Choudhury, C. F., Wang, P. & González, M. C. Development of origin–destination matrices using mobile phone call data. Transp. Res. C 40, 63–74 (2014).
Zhou, X. & Taylor, J. DTALite: a queue-based mesoscopic traffic simulator for fast model evaluation and calibration. Cogent Eng. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2014.961345 (2014).
Cheng, Q., Liu, Z., Lin, Y. & Zhou, X. S. An s-shaped three-parameter (S3) traffic stream model with consistent car following relationship. Transp. Res. B 153, 246–271 (2021).
Liu, J., Han, K., Chen, X. M. & Ong, G. P. Spatial–temporal inference of urban traffic emissions based on taxi trajectories and multi-source urban data. Transp. Res. C 106, 145–165 (2019).
Get Air Emissions Data (US Environmental Protection Agency, accessed 18 October 2024); https://www.epa.gov/air-emissions-inventories/get-air-emissions-data-0
Liu, Z. et al. Near-real-time monitoring of global CO2 emissions reveals the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. Nat. Commun. 11, 5172 (2020).
Le Quéré, C. et al. Temporary reduction in daily global CO2 emissions during the COVID-19 forced confinement. Nat. Clim. Change 10, 647–653 (2020).
Hu, S. et al. A big-data driven approach to analyzing and modeling human mobility trend under non-pharmaceutical interventions during COVID-19 pandemic. Transp. Res. C 124, 102955 (2021).
Isik, M., Dodder, R. & Kaplan, P. O. Transportation emissions scenarios for New York City under different carbon intensities of electricity and electric vehicle adoption rates. Nat. Energy 6, 92–104 (2021).
Manhattan Congestion Tracker 2025 (C2SMARTER, accessed 24 May 2025); https://c2smarter.engineering.nyu.edu/manhattan-congestion-tracker/
Cook, C. et al. The Short-Run Effects of Congestion Pricing in New York City Technical Report (National Bureau of Economic Research, 2025).
Winkler, L., Pearce, D., Nelson, J. & Babacan, O. The effect of sustainable mobility transition policies on cumulative urban transport emissions and energy demand. Nat. Commun. 14, 2357 (2023).
Liotta, C., Viguié, V. & Creutzig, F. Environmental and welfare gains via urban transport policy portfolios across 120 cities. Nat. Sustain. 6, 1067–1076 (2023).
Fu, X. et al. Co-benefits of transport demand reductions from compact urban development in Chinese cities. Nat. Sustain. 7, 294–304 (2024).
Grote, M., Williams, I., Preston, J. & Kemp, S. Including congestion effects in urban road traffic CO2 emissions modelling: do local government authorities have the right options? Transp. Res. D 43, 95–106 (2016).
Hu, S. et al. Understanding factors influencing user engagement in incentive-based travel demand management program. Transp. Res. A 186, 104145 (2024).
Çolak, S., Lima, A. & González, M. C. Understanding congested travel in urban areas. Nat. Commun. 7, 10793 (2016).
Meng, J. et al. The rise of south–south trade and its effect on global CO2 emissions. Nat. Commun. 9, 1871 (2018).
EMFAC On-Road Emissions Inventory (California Air Resources Board, 2025); https://arb.ca.gov/emfac/emissions-inventory
Hu, S. et al. Multi-crowdsourced data fusion for modeling link-level traffic resilience to adverse weather events. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 112, 104754 (2024).
Zhang, Y. et al. Bytetrack: Multi-object Tracking by Associating Every Detection Box (Springer, 2022).
Bewley, A., Ge, Z., Ott, L., Ramos, F. & Upcroft, B. Simple online and realtime tracking. In 2016 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP) 3464–3468 (IEEE, 2016).
Liu, Z. et al. A ConvNet for the 2020s. In 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2022, 11966–11976 (2022).
Zhou, X. S. et al. Flow-through tensors: a unified computational graph architecture for multi-layer transportation network optimization. Artif. Intell. Transp. 1, 100006 (2025).
Cuebiq Connecting people, places, and possibilities. https://cuebiq.com/ (2024).
Hu, S. A Big-Data-Driven Framework for Spatiotemporal Travel Demand Estimation and Prediction. Ph.D. thesis, Univ. Maryland (2023).
Zhou, X. S. et al. A meso-to-macro cross-resolution performance approach for connecting polynomial arrival queue model to volume-delay function with inflow demand-to-capacity ratio. Multimodal Transp. 1, 100017 (2022).
Lu, J. & Zhou, X. S. Virtual track networks: a hierarchical modeling framework and open-source tools for simplified and efficient connected and automated mobility (cam) system design based on general modeling network specification (gmns). Transp. Res. C 153, 104223 (2023).
Newell, G. F. A simplified theory of kinematic waves in highway traffic, part I: general theory. Transp. Res. B 27, 281–287 (1993).
Lu, C.-C., Zhou, X. & Zhang, K. Dynamic origin–destination demand flow estimation under congested traffic conditions. Transp. Res. C 34, 16–37 (2013).
Krishnakumari, P., Van Lint, H., Djukic, T. & Cats, O. A data driven method for od matrix estimation. Transp. Res. C 113, 38–56 (2020).
Motor Vehicle Emission Simulator: MOVES5 (Office of Transportation and Air Quality, US Environmental Protection Agency, 2024).
Liu, H. et al. Moves-matrix for high-performance on-road energy and running emission rate modeling applications. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 69, 1415–1428 (2019).
Lu, H. et al. Moves-Matrix 4.0 for High-Performance On-Road Energy Use and Emission Rate Modeling Applications Technical Report (National Center for Sustainable Transportation, 2025); https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0xg905w5
Wang, A. et al. Hyperlocal environmental data with a mobile platform in urban environments. Sci. Data 10, 524 (2023).
Cimorelli, A. J. et al. AERMOD: a dispersion model for industrial source applications. Part I: generalmodel formulation and boundary layer characterization. J. Appl. Meteorol. 44, 682–693 (2005).
