Sun, Z. et al. A review of earth artificial intelligence. Comput. Geosci. 159, 105034 (2022).
Zhao, T. et al. Artificial intelligence for geoscience: Progress, challenges and perspectives. Innovation (2024).
Zhang, W. et al. Application of machine learning, deep learning and optimization algorithms in geoengineering and geoscience: Comprehensive review and future challenge. Gondwana Res. 109, 1–17 (2022).
Monsalvo Franco, I. E. et al. Seismic fragility curves with unconventional ground motion intensity measures from physics-based simulations. Bull. Earthq. Eng. 23(5), 1885–1915 (2025).
Rossetto, T., Ioannou, I., Grant, D. & Maqsood, T. Guidelines for empirical vulnerability assessment (X, GEM Technical Reports, 2014).
Del Gaudio, C. et al. Empirical fragility curves from damage data on rc buildings after the 2009 L’Aquila earthquake. Bull. Earthq. Eng. 15, 1425–1450 (2017).
Mangalathu, S., Sun, H., Nweke, C. C., Yi, Z. & Burton, H. V. Classifying earthquake damage to buildings using machine learning. Earthq. Spectra 36(1), 183–208 (2020).
Roeslin, S., Ma, Q., Juárez-Garcia, H., Gómez-Bernal, A., Wicker, J. & Wotherspoon, L. A machine learning damage prediction model for the 2017 Puebla-Morelos, Mexico, earthquake. Earthq. Spectra 36(2_suppl), 314–339 (2020).
Harirchian, E. et al. A synthesized study based on machine learning approaches for rapid classifying earthquake damage grades to rc buildings. Appl. Sci. 11(16), 7540 (2021).
Stojadinović, Z., Kovačević, M., Marinković, D. & Stojadinović, B. Rapid earthquake loss assessment based on machine learning and representative sampling. Earthq. Spectra 38(1), 152–177 (2021).
Di Michele, F. et al. Comparison of machine learning tools for damage classification: The case of L’Aquila 2009 earthquake. Nat. Hazards 116, 3521–3546 (2023).
Di Michele, F. et al. Machine learning for damage classification, risk mitigation and post-earthquake management. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology. ICEES 2023. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering. Vol. 401. 181–190 (2023).
Di Michele, F., Stagnini, E., Pera, D., Aloisio, R. & Marcati, P. Random forest based estimate to asses the damages of a future earthquakes: Preliminary results. Ann. Geophys. 66 (2024).
Faenza, L., Michelini, A., Crowley, H., Borzi, B. & Faravelli, M. Shakedado: A data collection combining earthquake building damage and shakemap parameters for Italy. Artif. Intell. Geosci. 1, 36–51 (2020).
A. Cirella, A. Piatanesi, M. Cocco, E. Tinti, L. Scognamiglio, A. Michelini, A. Lomax, E. Boschi. Rupture history of the. L’Aquila (Italy) earthquake from non-linear joint inversion of strong motion and GPS data. Geophys. Res. Lett. 36(19), 2009 (2009).
Chiarabba, C. et al. The 2009 L’Aquila (central Italy) MW6. 3 earthquake: Main shock and aftershocks. Geophys. Res. Lett. 36(18) (2009).
Giaccio, B. et al. Fault and basin depocentre migration over the last 2 Ma in the L’Aquila 2009 earthquake region, central Italian Apennines. Quat. Sci. Rev. 56, 69–88 (2012).
S. Atzori, I. Hunstad, M. Chini, S. Salvi, C. Tolomei, C. Bignami, S. E. Stramondo, E. Trasatti, A. Antonioli, E. Boschi. Finite fault inversion of DInSAR coseismic displacement of the. L’Aquila earthquake (central Italy). Geophys. Res. Lett. 36(15), 2009 (2009).
Ameri, G., Gallovič, F. & Pacor, F. Complexity of the Mw 6.3 2009 L’Aquila (central Italy) earthquake: 2. Broadband strong motion modeling. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 117(B4) (2012).
Ameri, G. et al. The 6 April 2009 Mw 6.3 L’Aquila (central Italy) earthquake: Strong-motion observations. Seism. Res. Lett. 80(6), 951–966 (2009).
Pucci, S. et al. Coseismic ruptures of the 24 August 2016, mw 6.0 amatrice earthquake (central Italy). Geophys. Res. Lett. 44(5), 2138–2147 (2017).
Huang, M. H. et al. Coseismic deformation and triggered landslides of the 2016 mw 6.2 amatrice earthquake in Italy. Geophys. Res. Lett. 44(3), 1266–1274 (2017).
Lavecchia, G. et al. Ground deformation and source geometry of the 24 August 2016 amatrice earthquake (central Italy) investigated through analytical and numerical modeling of dinosaur measurements and structural-geological data. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43(24), 12–389 (2016).
Chiaraluce, L. et al. The 2016 central Italy seismic sequence: A first look at the mainshocks, aftershocks, and source models. Seismol. Res. Lett. 88(3), 757–771 (2017).
Liu, C., Zheng, Y., Xie, Z. & Xiong, X. Rupture features of the 2016 mw 6.2 Norcia earthquake and its possible relationship with strong seismic hazards. Geophys. Res. Lett. 44(3), 1320–1328 (2017).
Villani, F. et al. A database of the coseismic effects following the 30 October 2016 Norcia earthquake in central Italy. Sci. Data 5(1), 1–11 (2018).
Mazzieri, I., Stupazzini, M., Guidotti, R. & Smerzini, C. SPEED: SPectral Elements in Elastodynamics with Discontinuous Galerkin: A non-conforming approach for 3D multi-scale problems. Int. J. Numer. Method Eng. 95(12), 991–1010 (2013).
Lanzano, G. et al. A revised ground-motion prediction model for shallow crustal earthquakes in Italy. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 109(2), 525–540 (2019).
Michelini, A., Faenza, L., Lauciani, V. & Malagnini, L. Shakemap implementation in Italy. Seismol. Res. Lett. 79(5), 688–697 (2008).
Wald, D. J. et al. Trinet “shakemaps’’: Rapid generation of peak ground motion and intensity maps for earthquakes in southern California. Earthq. Spectra 15(3), 537–555 (1999).
May, J.B., Pera, D., Di Michele, F., Aloisio, R., Rubino, B. & Marcati, P. Fast cubit-python tool for highly accurate topography generation and layered domain reconstruction. In Proceedings of the 29th International Meshing Roundtable (2021).
Tarquini, S. et al. TINITALY/01: A new triangular irregular network of Italy. Ann. Geophys. 50(3), 407–425 (2007).
Tarquini, S. et al. Release of a 10-m-resolution DEM for the Italian territory: Comparison with global-coverage DEMs and anaglyph-mode exploration via the web. Comput. Geosci. 38(1), 168–170 (2012).
Tarquini, S. & Nannipieri, L. The 10 m-resolution TINITALY DEM as a trans-disciplinary basis for the analysis of the Italian territory: Current trends and new perspectives. Geomorphology 281, 108–115 (2017).
Evangelista, L. et al. Physics-based seismic input for engineering applications: A case study in the Aterno River Valley, central Italy. Bull. Earthq. Eng. 15(7), 2645–2671 (2017).
Di Michele, F. et al. Spectral element numerical simulation of the 2009 L’Aquila earthquake on a detailed reconstructed domain. Geophys. J. Int. 230(1), 29–49 (2022).
Rosti, A., Smerzini, C., Paolucci, R., Penna, A. & Rota, M. Validation of physics-based ground shaking scenarios for empirical fragility studies: The case of the 2009 L’Aquila earthquake. Bull. Earthq. Eng. 21(1), 95–123 (2023).
Smerzini, C. & Villani, M. Broadband numerical simulations in complex near-field geological configurations: The case of the 2009 m w 6.3 L’Aquila earthquake. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 102(6), 2436–2451 (2012).
Iwaki, A., Maeda, T., Morikawa, N., Miyake, H. & Fujiwara, H. Validation of the recipe for broadband ground-motion simulations of Japanese crustal earthquakes. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 106(5), 2214–2232 (2016).
Graves, R. W. & Pitarka, A. Broadband ground-motion simulation using a hybrid approach. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 100(5A), 2095–2123 (2010).
Mai, P. M., Imperatori, W. & Olsen, K. B. Hybrid broadband ground-motion simulations: Combining long-period deterministic synthetics with high-frequency multiple s-to-s backscattering. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 100(5A), 2124–2142 (2010).
Paolucci, R. et al. Broadband ground motions from 3d physics-based numerical simulations using artificial neural networks broadband ground motions from 3d pbss using anns. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 108(3A), 1272–1286 (2018).
Fondazione Eucentre. Da.D.O. (Database di Danno Osservato).
T. K. Ho. Random decision forests. In Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition. Vol. 1. 278–282 (1995).
Raschka, S., & Mirjalili, V. Python Machine Learning: Machine Learning and Deep Learning with Python. Scikit-Learn, and TensorFlow. 2nd Ed. (Packt Publishing Limited, 2017).
Chawla, N. V., Bowyer, K. W., Hall, L. O. & Kegelmeyer, W. P. Smote: Synthetic minority over-sampling technique. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 16, 321–357 (2002).
Anniballe, Roberta et al. Earthquake damage mapping: An overall assessment of ground surveys and vhr image change detection after L’Aquila 2009 earthquake. Remote Sens. Environ. 210, 166–178 (2018).
Harati, M. & Van de Lindt, J. W. Methodology to generate earthquake-tsunami fragility surfaces for community resilience modeling. Eng. Struct. 305, 117700 (2024).
