• Bettencourt, L. M. A. Introduction to Urban Science: Evidence and Theory of Cities as Complex Systems (MIT Press, 2021).

  • Batty, M. The Computable City: Histories, Technologies, Stories, Predictions (MIT Press, 2024).

  • Batty, M. Big data, smart cities and city planning. Dialogues Hum. Geogr. 3, 274–279 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Stiny, G. & Gips, J. Shape grammars and the generative specification of painting and sculpture. In IFIP Congress vol. 2, 125–135 (Citeseer, 1971).

  • Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S. & Silverstein, M. A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction (Oxford Univ. Press, 1977).

  • White, R. & Engelen, G. Cellular automata and fractal urban form: a cellular modelling approach to the evolution of urban land-use patterns. Environ. Plann. A 25, 1175–1199 (1993).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Schelling, T. C. Dynamic models of segregation. J. Math. Sociol. 1, 143–186 (1971).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhang, Y. et al. Metacity: data-driven sustainable development of complex cities. Innovation 6, 100775 (2025).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Goodfellow, I. J. et al. Generative adversarial nets. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 27, 2672–2680 (NeurIPS, 2014).

  • Ho, J., Jain, A. & Abbeel, P. Denoising diffusion probabilistic models. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 33, 6840–6851 (2020).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Wang, Q. et al. Generative ai for urban planning: synthesizing satellite imagery via diffusion models. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 122, 102339 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ouyang, L. et al. Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 35, 27730–27744 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Achiam, J. et al. GPT-4 technical report. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.08774 (2023).

  • Gao, C. et al. Large language models empowered agent-based modeling and simulation: a survey and perspectives. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun. 11, 1259 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wang, J. et al. Large language models as urban residents: an LLM agent framework for personal mobility generation. In Proc. 38th Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 124547–124574 (NeurIPS, 2024).

  • Zhou, Z., Lin, Y., Jin, D. & Li, Y. Large language model for participatory urban planning. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.17161 (2024).

  • Huang, L. et al. A survey on hallucination in large language models: principles, taxonomy, challenges, and open questions. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 43, 1–55 (2025).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Agarwal, M. et al. General geospatial inference with a population dynamics foundation model. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.07207 (2024).

  • Tuia, D. et al. Artificial intelligence to advance earth observation: a review of models, recent trends, and pathways forward. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Mag. 13, 119–141 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Batty, M. Digital twins in city planning. Nat. Comput. Sci. 4, 192–199 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zheng, Y. et al. Spatial planning of urban communities via deep reinforcement learning. Nat. Comput. Sci. 3, 748–762 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fu, X., Li, C., Quan, S. J., Yigitcanlar, T. & Wasserman, D. Large language models in urban planning. Nat. Cities 2, 585–592 (2025).

  • Taeihagh, A. Governance of generative ai. Policy Soc. 44, 1–22 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kronblad, C., Essén, A. & Mähring, M. When justice is blind to algorithms: multilayered blackboxing of algorithmic decision-making in the public sector. MIS Quart. 48, 1637–1662 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wilson, A. G. A family of spatial interaction models, and associated developments. Environ. Plann. A 3, 1–32 (1971).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ben-Akiva, M. E. & Lerman, S. R. Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand Vol. 9 (MIT Press, 1985).

  • Bonabeau, E. Agent-based modeling: methods and techniques for simulating human systems. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 7280–7287 (2002).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lighthill, M. J. & Whitham, G. B. On kinematic waves II. A theory of traffic flow on long crowded roads. Proc. R. Soc. A 229, 317–345 (1955).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Sheffi, Y. Urban Transportation Networks: Equilibrium Analysis with Mathematical Programming Methods (Prentice-Hall, 1985).

  • Arnfield, A. J. Two decades of urban climate research: a review of turbulence, exchanges of energy and water, and the urban heat island. Int. J. Climatol. 23, 1–26 (2003).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Marchau, V. A., Walker, W. E., Bloemen, P. J. & Popper, S. W. Decision Making under Deep Uncertainty: From Theory to Practice (Springer, 2019).

  • Bettencourt, L. M. A. Recent achievements and conceptual challenges for urban digital twins. Nat. Comput. Sci. 4, 150–153 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Khanna, S. et al. DiffusionSat: a generative foundation model for satellite imagery. In The 12th International Conference on Learning Representations, 5586–5604 (ICLR, 2024).

  • Yu, Z., Liu, C., Liu, L., Shi, Z. & Zou, Z. MetaEarth: a generative foundation model for global-scale remote sensing image generation. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 47, 1764–1781 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Xu, E. et al. A survey of physics-informed AI for complex urban systems. Inf. Fusion 129, 104012 (2026).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jankovic, B., Jangirova, S., Ullah, W., Khan, L. U. & Guizani, M. UAV-assisted real-time disaster detection using optimized transformer model. In 2025 IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications 1–7 (IEEE, 2025).

  • Berke, A., Doorley, R., Larson, K. & Moro, E. Generating synthetic mobility data for a realistic population with rnns to improve utility and privacy. In Proc. 37th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing 964–967 (2022).

  • Feng, J. et al. CityBench: evaluating the capabilities of large language models for urban tasks. Proc. 31st ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 5413–5424 (ACM, 2025).

  • Xuan, W. et al. DynamicVL: benchmarking multimodal large language models for dynamic city understanding. In The 39th Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems Datasets and Benchmarks Track, https://neurips.cc/virtual/2025/loc/san-diego/poster/121371 (Curran Associates, 2025).

  • Zhan, Y., Xiong, Z. & Yuan, Y. Skyeyegpt: unifying remote sensing vision–language tasks via instruction tuning with large language model. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 221, 64–77 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yuan, Y., Wang, H., Ding, J., Jin, D. & Li, Y. Learning to simulate daily activities via modeling dynamic human needs. In Proc. ACM Web Conference 2023, 906–916 (Association for Computing Machinery, 2023).

  • Zhang, Y., Ma, R., Zhang, X. & Li, Y. Perceiving urban inequality from imagery using visual language models with chain-of-thought reasoning. In Proc. ACM on Web Conference 2025, 5342–5351 (Association for Computing Machinery, 2025).

  • Paolanti, M. et al. Ethical framework to assess and quantify the trustworthiness of artificial intelligence techniques: application case in remote sensing. Remote Sens. 16, 4529 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Koldasbayeva, D. et al. Challenges in data-driven geospatial modeling for environmental research and practice. Nat. Commun. 15, 10700 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Manvi, R., Khanna, S., Burke, M., Lobell, D. B. & Ermon, S. Large language models are geographically biased. In Proc. 41st Int. Conf. Mach. Learn. 235, 34654–34669 (PMLR, 2024).

  • Hall, M. et al. Towards geographic inclusion in the evaluation of text-to-image models. In Proc. 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 585–601 (Association for Computing Machinery, 2024).

  • Ma, Y., Chen, S., Ermon, S. & Lobell, D. B. Transfer learning in environmental remote sensing. Remote Sens. Environ. 301, 113924 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cheng, Y. et al. Exploring large language model based intelligent agents: definitions, methods, and prospects. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.03428 (2024).

  • Sun, Y. Q. et al. Can AI weather models predict out-of-distribution gray swan tropical cyclones? Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 122, e2420914122 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Papyshev, G. & Yarime, M. Exploring city digital twins as policy tools: a task-based approach to generating synthetic data on urban mobility. Data Policy 3, e16 (2021).

  • Hofmann, J. & Schüttrumpf, H. Floodgan: using deep adversarial learning to predict pluvial flooding in real time. Water 13, 2255 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Camps-Valls, G. et al. Artificial intelligence for modeling and understanding extreme weather and climate events. Nat. Commun. 16, 1919 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zeng, J. et al. Opencarbon: a contrastive learning-based cross-modality neural approach for high-resolution carbon emission prediction using open data. In Proc. 34th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence 9999–10007 (IJCAI, 2025).

  • Gao, J. et al. GenFusion: crafting future urban building layouts via diffusion model and genetic algorithm. Inf. Geogr. 1, 100015 (2025).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Li, Y. et al. Generative models in decision making: a survey. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.17100 (2025).

  • Ding, W., Chen, B., Xu, M. & Zhao, D. Learning to collide: an adaptive safety-critical scenarios generating method. In 2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2243–2250 (IEEE, 2020).

  • Yuan, Y., Ding, J., Wang, H. & Jin, D. Generating daily activities with need dynamics. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. 15, 1–28 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yuan, Y., Ding, J., Jin, D. & Li, Y. Learning the complexity of urban mobility with deep generative network. PNAS Nexus 4, pgaf081 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Park, J. S. et al. Generative agents: interactive simulacra of human behavior. In Proc. 36th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (eds Follmer, S. et al.) 1–22 (ACM, 2023).

  • Piao, J. et al. AgentSociety: large-scale simulation of LLM-driven generative agents advances understanding of human behaviors and society. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.08691 (2025).

  • Tao, Y., Viberg, O., Baker, R. S. & Kizilcec, R. F. Cultural bias and cultural alignment of large language models. PNAS Nexus 3, pgae346 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Park, J. S. et al. Social simulacra: creating populated prototypes for social computing systems. In Proc. 35th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, 1–18 (Association for Computing Machinery, 2022).

  • Yan, Y. et al. Opencity: a scalable platform to simulate urban activities with massive LLM agents. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.21286 (2024).

  • Yang, Z. et al. Oasis: open agent social interaction simulations with one million agents. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.11581 (2024).

  • Chopra, A., Kumar, S., Kuru, N. G., Raskar, R. & Quera-Bofarull, A. On the limits of agency in agent-based models. In Proc. 24th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 500–509 (International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 2025).

  • Hüllermeier, E. & Waegeman, W. Aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty in machine learning: an introduction to concepts and methods. Mach. Learn. 110, 457–506 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kashinath, K. et al. Physics-informed machine learning: case studies for weather and climate modelling. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 379, 20200093 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kapoor, S. et al. Reforms: consensus-based recommendations for machine-learning-based science. Sci. Adv. 10, eadk3452 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Xu, H. et al. Leveraging generative ai for urban digital twins: a scoping review on the autonomous generation of urban data, scenarios, designs, and 3D city models for smart city advancement. Urban Inform. 3, 29 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zheng, Y. et al. A survey of machine learning for urban decision making: applications in planning, transportation, and healthcare. ACM Comput. Surv. 57, 1–41 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ravuri, S. et al. Skilful precipitation nowcasting using deep generative models of radar. Nature 597, 672–677 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Otal, H. T., Stern, E. & Canbaz, M. A. LLM-assisted crisis management: building advanced LLM platforms for effective emergency response and public collaboration. In 2024 IEEE Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 851–859 (IEEE, 2024).

  • Zhang, G., Yu, Z., Jin, D. & Li, Y. Physics-infused machine learning for crowd simulation. In Proc. 28th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2439–2449 (Association for Computing Machinery, 2022).

  • Chen, L. et al. Strategic COVID-19 vaccine distribution can simultaneously elevate social utility and equity. Nat. Hum. Behav. 6, 1503–1514 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhang, J., Ao, W., Yan, J., Jin, D. & Li, Y. A GPU-accelerated large-scale simulator for transportation system optimization benchmarking. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.10661 (2024).

  • Zhang, H. et al. Cityflow: a multi-agent reinforcement learning environment for large scale city traffic scenario. In The World Wide Web Conference, 3620–3624 (Association for Computing Machinery, 2019).

  • Chen, H. et al. DiffLight: a partial rewards conditioned diffusion model for traffic signal control with missing data. In Proc. 38th Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 123353–123378 (NeurIPS, 2024).

  • Hu, X. et al. Dual-stage flows-based generative modeling for traceable urban planning. In Proc. 2024 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining (eds Shekhar, S. et al.) 370–378 (SIAM, 2024).

  • Busuioc, M. Accountable artificial intelligence: holding algorithms to account. Public Adm. Rev. 81, 825–836 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Green, B. The flaws of policies requiring human oversight of government algorithms. Comput. Law Secur. Rev. 45, 105681 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Alon-Barkat, S. & Busuioc, M. Human–AI interactions in public sector decision making: automation bias and selective adherence to algorithmic advice. J. Public Adm. Res. Theory 33, 153–169 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Raji, I. D. et al. Closing the ai accountability gap: defining an end-to-end framework for internal algorithmic auditing. In Proc. 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 33–44 (Association for Computing Machinery, 2020).

  • Suresh, H. & Guttag, J. A framework for understanding sources of harm throughout the machine learning life cycle. In Proc. 1st ACM Conference on Equity and Access in Algorithms, Mechanisms, and Optimization, 1–9 (Association for Computing Machinery, 2021).

  • Chattopadhyay, A. & Hassanzadeh, P. Long-term instabilities of deep learning-based digital twins of the climate system: the cause and a solution. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.07029 (2023).

  • Baykurt, B. Algorithmic accountability in US cities: transparency, impact, and political economy. Big Data Soc. 9, 20539517221115426 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rong, C., Ding, J., Liu, Y. & Li, Y. A large-scale dataset and benchmark for commuting origin–destination flow generation. In The 13th International Conference on Learning Representations, https://neurips.cc/virtual/2025/loc/san-diego/poster/121846 (NeurIPS, 2025).

  • Feng, J. et al. Citygpt: empowering urban spatial cognition of large language models. In Proc. 31st ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining V.2, 591–602 (Association for Computing Machinery, 2025).

  • Feng, J., Wang, S., Liu, T., Xi, Y. & Li, Y. UrbanLLaVA: a multi-modal large language model for urban intelligence with spatial reasoning and understanding. In Proc. IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 6209–6219 (IEEE, 2025).

  • Karniadakis, G. E. et al. Physics-informed machine learning. Nat. Rev. Phys. 3, 422–440 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. World urbanization prospects 2018: highlights. un.org https://population.un.org/wup/assets/WUP2018-Highlights.pdf (2019).

  • Bettencourt, L. M. & Marchio, N. Infrastructure deficits and informal settlements in sub-Saharan Africa. Nature 645, 399–406 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kuffer, M., Pfeffer, K. & Sliuzas, R. Slums from space—15 years of slum mapping using remote sensing. Remote Sens. 8, 455 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • da Silva, J. P., Rodrigues-Jr, J. F. & de Albuquerque, J. P. On the power of CNNs to detect slums in Brazil. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 121, 102306 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Brelsford, C., Martin, T., Hand, J. & Bettencourt, L. M. A. Toward cities without slums: topology and the spatial evolution of neighborhoods. Sci. Adv. 4, eaar4644 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gevaert, C. M., Buunk, T. & Van Den Homberg, M. J. Auditing geospatial datasets for biases: using global building datasets for disaster risk management. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 17, 12579–12590 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chamberlain, H. R. et al. Building footprint data for countries in Africa: to what extent are existing data products comparable?. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 110, 102104 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Herfort, B., Lautenbach, S., Porto de Albuquerque, J., Anderson, J. & Zipf, A. A spatio-temporal analysis investigating completeness and inequalities of global urban building data in openstreetmap. Nat. Commun. 14, 3985 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lacoste, A. et al. GEO-Bench: toward foundation models for Earth monitoring. Adv Neural Inf. Proc. Syst. 36, 51080–51093 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hong, D. et al. Cross-city matters: a multimodal remote sensing benchmark dataset for cross-city semantic segmentation using high-resolution domain adaptation networks. Remote Sens. Environ. 299, 113856 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Vergara-Perucich, J. F. Ai-driven deconstruction of urban regulatory frameworks: unveiling social sustainability gaps in santiago’s communal zoning. Urban Sci. 9, 186 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Xie, Y. et al. Fairness by where: a statistically-robust and model-agnostic bi-level learning framework. Proc. AAAI Conf. Artif. Intell. 36, 12208–12216 (2022).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Gebru, T. et al. Datasheets for datasets. Commun. ACM 64, 86–92 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Liu, Y., James, J. Q., Kang, J., Niyato, D. & Zhang, S. Privacy-preserving traffic flow prediction: a federated learning approach. IEEE Internet Things J. 7, 7751–7763 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Li, X. & Dang, A. The disruptive effect of ai on urban planning. Nat. Cities 2, 568–570 (2025).

  • Sanchez, T. W., Brenman, M. & Ye, X. The ethical concerns of artificial intelligence in urban planning. J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 91, 294–307 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Choi, S. L. et al. eGridGPT: Trustworthy AI in the Control Room. NREL/TP-5D00-87440 (National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2024).



  • Source link