• Adnan, M. et al. Human inventions and its environmental challenges, especially artificial intelligence: New challenges require new thinking. Environ. Chall. 16, 100976 (2024).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Flah, M., Nunez, I., Ben Chaabene, W. & Nehdi, M. L. Machine learning algorithms in civil structural health monitoring: A systematic review. Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 28, 2621–2643 (2021).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Baduge, S. K. et al. Artificial intelligence and smart vision for building and construction 4.0: Machine and deep learning methods and applications. Autom. Constr. 141, 104440 (2022).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Khan, K. et al. PCA-based hybrid intelligence models for estimating the ultimate bearing capacity of axially loaded concrete-filled steel tubes. Materials (Basel). 15, (2022).

  • Plevris, V. & Papazafeiropoulos, G. AI in structural health monitoring for infrastructure maintenance and safety. Infrastructures 9, 1–25 (2024).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Lai, X. et al. Digital twin-based structural health monitoring by combining measurement and computational data: An aircraft wing example. J. Manuf. Syst. 69, 76–90 (2023).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Luo, D. et al. Artificial intelligence in the design, optimization, and performance prediction of concrete materials: A comprehensive review. NPJ Mater. Sustain. 17 3 (1), 1–35 (2025).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Liao, W., Lu, X., Fei, Y., Gu, Y. & Huang, Y. Generative AI design for building structures. Autom. Constr. 157, 105187 (2024).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Sakr, M. & Sadhu, A. Recent progress and future outlook of digital twins in structural health monitoring of civil infrastructure. Smart Mater. Struct. 33, 033001 (2024).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Lee, D. & Kim, M. Autonomous construction hoist system based on deep reinforcement learning in high-rise building construction. Autom. Constr. 128, 103737 (2021).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Fan, Q. et al. Cement grouting online monitoring and intelligent control for dam foundations. J. Intell. Constr. 1, 9180005 (2023).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Mukhtar, H. Artificial Intelligence Techniques for Human-Machine Interaction (Elsevier Inc., 2024).

  • Jiang, H. & Qiu, X. Performance assessment of a newly developed and highly stable grouting material for a completely weathered granite dam foundation. Constr. Build. Mater. 299, 123956 (2021).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Ghaffari, A., Shahbazi, Y., Mokhtari Kashavar, M., Fotouhi, M. & Pedrammehr, S. Advanced predictive structural health monitoring in high-rise buildings using recurrent neural networks. Buildings. 14, 3261 (2024).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Jayawickrema, U. M. N., Herath, H. M. C. M., Hettiarachchi, N. K., Sooriyaarachchi, H. P. & Epaarachchi, J. A. Fibre-optic sensor and deep learning-based structural health monitoring systems for civil structures: A review. Meas. J. Int. Meas. Confed. 199, 111543 (2022).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Xu, J., Shu, X., Qiao, P., Li, S. & Xu, J. Developing a digital twin model for monitoring building structural health by combining a building information model and a real-scene 3D model. Meas J. Int. Meas. Confed 217, (2023).

  • Azanaw, G. M. Integrating AI in structural health monitoring (SHM): A systematic review on advances, challenges, and future directions, 1–24 (2025).

  • Krishnan, A., Sundaram, T., Nagappan, B. & Devarajan, Y. Bhumika integrating artificial intelligence in nanomembrane systems for advanced water desalination. Results Eng. 24, 103321 (2024).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Xu, Y. et al. Machine-learning-based deformation prediction method for deep foundation-pit enclosure structure. Appl. Sci. 14, 1273 (2024).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Afshar, A., Nouri, G., Ghazvineh, S. & Hosseini Lavassani, S. H. Machine-learning applications in structural response prediction: A review. Pract. Period Struct. Des. Constr. 29, 1–23 (2024).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Liang, J. et al. Intelligent prediction model of a polymer fracture grouting effect based on a genetic algorithm-optimized back propagation neural network. Tunn. Undergr. Sp Technol. 148, (2024).

  • Liao, W., Lu, X. & Fei, Y. Generative artificial intelligence for structural design of tall buildings. Int. J. High-Rise Build. 12, 203–208 (2023).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Chaabene, W., Ben; Flah, M. & Nehdi, M. L. Machine learning prediction of mechanical properties of concrete: Critical review. Constr. Build. Mater. 260, 119889 (2020).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Liu, H., Su, H., Sun, L. & Dias-da-Costa, D. State-of-the-Art Review on the Use of AI-Enhanced Computational Mechanics in Geotechnical Engineering, vol. 57 (Springer Netherlands, 2024).

  • Sun, Z. et al. Approach towards the development of digital twin for structural health monitoring of civil infrastructure: A comprehensive review. Sensors. 25, 59 (2024).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Ding, Q., Ren, H., Xu, D., Du, G. & Yang, P. Study of new materials for controlled grouting reinforcement. Adv. Transdiscipl. Eng. 40, 132–138 (2023).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhao, W., Chen, P., Liu, X. & Wang, L. Impact response prediction and optimization of SC walls using machine learning algorithms. Structures 45, 390–399 (2022).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Huang, D. et al. Investigating the Structural Health of High-Rise Buildings and Its Influencing Factors Using Sentinel-1 Synthetic Aperture Radar Imagery: A Case Study of the Guangzhou–Foshan (2024).

  • Sun, W., Chen, W. & Long, Y. Monitoring and analysis of settlement and deformation status of high-rise buildings based on nonlinear regression. Meas. Sens. 35, 101287 (2024).


    Google Scholar
     

  • He, Y. et al. Detailed hazard identification of urban subsidence in Guangzhou and Foshan by combining InSAR and optical imagery. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 135, 104291 (2024).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Sharafat, A., Tanoli, W. A., Zubair, M. U. & Mazher, K. M. Digital twin-driven stability optimization framework for large underground caverns. Appl. Sci. 15 (8), 4481 (2025).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Xu, J., Yan, C., Su, Y. & Liu, Y. Analysis of high-rise building safety detection methods based on big data and artificial intelligence. Int. J. Distrib. Sens. Netw. 16 (6), 1550147720935307 (2020).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Lee, S., Bae, J. Y., Sharafat, A. & Seo, J. Waste lime earthwork management using drone and BIM technology for construction projects: The case study of urban development project. KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 28 (2), 517–531 (2024).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Ekici, B., Turkcan, O. F., Turrin, M., Sariyildiz, I. S. & Tasgetiren, M. F. Optimising high-rise buildings for self-sufficiency in energy consumption and food production using artificial intelligence: Case of Europoint complex in Rotterdam. Energies 15 (2), 660 (2022).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Lee, S., Sharafat, A., Kim, I. S. & Seo, J. Development and assessment of an intelligent compaction system for compaction quality monitoring, assurance, and management. Appl. Sci. 12 (14), 6855 (2022).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Muhammad Waleed, Q. et al. M. U., Development of BIM-based tunnel information modeling prototype for tunnel design. Adv. Civ. Eng. 2024(1), 8118578 (2024).

  • Hui, Y., Tang, Y., Yang, Q. & Mochida, A. Numerical study on influence of surface vegetation on aerodynamics of high-rise buildings. Sustain. Cities Soc. 107, 105407 (2024).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Yang, H. et al. Data-driven high resolution total focus imaging from array ultrasonic time-domain signals of reinforced concrete material. Constr. Build. Mater. 492, 143048 (2025).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Yang, J., Liu, Y., Lu, X. & Wang, T. An adaptive measurement-based substructure identification framework for dynamic response reconstruction. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 239, 113277 (2025).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Tricco, A. C. et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Ann. Intern. Med. 169, 467–473 (2018).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Levac, D., Colquhoun, H. & O’brien, K. K. Scoping studies: Advancing the methodology. Implement. Sci. 5, 1–9 (2010).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Yevu, S. K., Blay, K. B., Ayinla, K. & Hadjidemetriou, G. Artificial intelligence in offsite and modular construction research. Autom. Constr. 171, 105994 (2025).


    Google Scholar
     

  • CAO, W., WU, X. & LI, J. KANG, F. A. Review of artificial intelligence in dam engineering. J. Infrastruct. Intell. Resil. 4, 100122 (2024).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Avci, Y. & Ekmen, A. B. Artificial intelligence assisted optimization of rammed aggregate pier supported raft foundation systems based on parametric three-dimensional finite element analysis. Structures 56, 105031 (2023).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Tusnin, A. R., Alekseytsev, A. V. & Tusnina, O. Using machine learning technologies to design modular buildings. Buildings 14, 2213 (2024).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Jong, S. C., Ong, D. E. L. & Oh, E. State-of-the-art review of geotechnical-driven artificial intelligence techniques in underground soil-structure interaction. Tunn Undergr. Sp Technol. 113, (2021).

  • Zhu, A., Zhang, Z. & Pan, W. Technologies, levels and directions of crane-lift automation in construction. Autom. Constr. 153, 104960 (2023).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Albahri, A. S. et al. A Systematic review of trustworthy artificial intelligence applications in natural disasters. Comput. Electr. Eng. 118, 109409 (2024).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhao, W., Feng, S., Liu, J. & Sun, B. An explainable intelligent algorithm for the multiple performance prediction of cement-based grouting materials. Constr. Build. Mater. 366, 130146 (2023).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Zheng, C. et al. Decentralized artificial intelligence in construction using blockchain. Autom. Constr. 166, 105669 (2024).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Hosseini, S. et al. Aziz, N. Predicting Grout’s uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) for fully grouted rock bolting system by applying ensemble machine learning techniques. Neural Comput. Appl. 36, 18387–18412 (2024).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Shen, Z., Chen, D., Zhao, L. & Wei, Y. Toward the balance between computational cost and model performance for the void detection of concrete-filled steel tubular structure using one-dimensional mel-frequency cepstral coefficients and ensemble machine learning. Constr. Build. Mater. 411, 134366 (2024).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Zadhesh, J., Rastegar, F., Sharifi, F., Amini, H. & Nasirabad, H. M. Consolidation grouting quality assessment using artificial neural network (ANN). Indian Geotech. J. 45, 136–144 (2015).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Inazumi, S. & Shakya, S. A. Comprehensive review of sustainable assessment and innovation in jet grouting technologies. Sustain 16, 1–20 (2024).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhang, E. et al. Prediction, and application of strength and stiffness parameters for grouted reconstructed rock mass. Sci. Rep. 14, 1–19 (2024).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Mei, Y., Ke, X., Zhou, D., Zhang, S. & Yang, T. Study on the whole process application of advanced grouting pipe shed support under urban complex stratum conditions. Geomech. Energy Environ. 33, 100432 (2023).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Latifi, R., Hadzima-Nyarko, M., Radu, D. & Rouhi, R. A. Brief overview on crack patterns, repair and strengthening of historical masonry structures. Mater. (Basel). 16, 1882 (2023).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Kang, H., Li, W., Gao, F. & Yang, J. Grouting theories and technologies for the reinforcement of fractured rocks surrounding deep roadways. Deep Undergr. Sci. Eng. 2, 2–19 (2023).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Chao, K. et al. Big Data-Driven Public Health Policy Making: Potential for the Healthcare Industry. Heliyon 9, e19681 (2023).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Lu, Y., Gong, P., Tang, Y., Sun, S. & Li, Q. BIM-integrated construction safety risk assessment at the design stage of building projects. Autom. Constr. 124, 103553 (2021).

  • Gholipour, M. & Mazloom, M. Seismic response analysis of mega-scale buckling-restrained bracing systems in tall buildings. Adv. Comput. Des. 3, 17–34 (2018).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Zheng, Y., Wang, S., Zhang, P., Xu, T. & Zhuo, J. Application of nondestructive testing technology in quality evaluation of plain concrete and RC structures in bridge engineering: A review. Buildings. 12, 843 (2022).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhang, W., Gu, X., Hong, L., Han, L. & Wang, L. Comprehensive review of machine learning in geotechnical reliability analysis: Algorithms, applications and further challenges. Appl. Soft Comput. 136, 110066 (2023).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Li, C. Z., Li, S., Ya, Y. & Tam, V. W. Y. Digital inspection techniques of modular integrated construction. Heliyon. 9, e21399 (2023).

  • Park, M. et al. Lifting demand-based zoning for minimizing worker vertical transportation time in high-rise building construction. Autom. Constr. 32, 88–95 (2013).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Rojas-Carabali, W. et al. Managing a patient with uveitis in the era of artificial intelligence: Current approaches, emerging trends, and future perspectives. Asia-Pac. J. Ophthalmol 13, (2024).

  • Fernández, R., Correal, J. F., D’Ayala, D. & Medaglia, A. L. Towards disaster risk mitigation on large-scale school intervention programs. Int J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 90, (2023).

  • Zou, X. et al. Advancing tunnel equipment maintenance through data-driven predictive strategies in underground infrastructure. Comput. Geotech. 173, (2024).

  • Li, X. et al. Structural health monitoring of a historic building during uplifting process: System design and data analysis. Struct. Health Monit. 22, 3165–3188 (2023).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Tran, D. et al. Analysis of artificial intelligence approaches to predict the wall deflection induced by deep excavation. Open. Geosci. 15, 1–22 (2023).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Malekloo, A., Ozer, E., AlHamaydeh, M. & Girolami, M. Machine Learning and Structural Health Monitoring Overview with Emerging Technology and High-Dimensional Data Source Highlights, vol. 21 (2022).

  • Keshmiry, A., Hassani, S., Dackermann, U. & Li, J. Assessment, repair, and retrofitting of masonry structures: A comprehensive review. Constr. Build. Mater. 442, 137380 (2024).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Calabrese, L., Campanella, G. & Proverbio, E. Identification of corrosion mechanisms by univariate and multivariate statistical analysis during long term acoustic emission monitoring on a pre-stressed concrete beam. Corros. Sci. 73, 161–171 (2013).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Yang, C. & Li, X. Seismic performance analysis of fabricated concrete beam-column joints based on intelligent finite element analysis. J. Electr. Comput. Eng. (2022).

  • Jiang, Y. et al. Tunnel lining detection and retrofitting. Autom. Constr. 152, 104881 (2023).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Al-shawafi, A., Zhu, H., Laqsum, S. A., Haruna, S. I. & Ibrahim, Y. E. Improved static and impact properties of UHPFRC retrofitted with PU grout materials: Experiments and ML algorithms. Results Eng. 23, 102655 (2024).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhou, J., Qi, H., Peng, K., Zhang, Y. & Khandelwal, M. C. Review and future perspectives on prediction and mitigation of tunnel-induced ground settlement: A bibliometric analysis and methodological overview (2002–2022). Tunn. Undergr. Sp Technol. 154, 106081 (2024).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhang, C. et al. Cement based eco-grouting composite for pre-reinforcement of shallow underground excavation in vegetation protection area. Tunn. Undergr. Sp Technol. 118, 104188 (2021).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Curbach, M. et al. New perspectives on carbon reinforced concrete structures—Why new composites need new design strategies. Civ. Eng. Des. 5, 67–94 (2024).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Tapeh, A. T., Gharah & Naser, M. Z. Artificial intelligence, machine learning, and deep learning in structural engineering: a scientometrics review of trends and best practices. Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 30, 115–159 (2023).


    Google Scholar
     



  • Source link