• Stanković, A. M. et al. Methods for analysis and quantification of power system resilience. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 38, 4774–4787 (2022). This work consolidates the conceptual attributes, analytical methods and quantitative measures for power system resilience assessment.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bie, Z., Lin, Y., Li, G. & Li, F. Battling the extreme: a study on the power system resilience. Proc. IEEE 105, 1253–1266 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Erenoğlu, A. K., Sengor, I. & Erdinç, O. Power system resiliency: a comprehensive overview from implementation aspects and innovative concepts. Energy Nexus 15, 100311 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Liu, X. et al. A planning-oriented resilience assessment framework for transmission systems under typhoon disasters. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 11, 5431–5441 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Xu, L. et al. Resilience of renewable power systems under climate risks. Nat. Rev. Electr. Eng. 1, 53–66 (2024). This work identifies the superimposed risks created by intensifying climate extremes and increasing renewable penetration.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Thompson, V. et al. The most at-risk regions in the world for high-impact heatwaves. Nat. Commun. 14, 2152 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cohen, J., Agel, L., Barlow, M., Garfinkel, C. I. & White, I. Linking Arctic variability and change with extreme winter weather in the United States. Science 373, 1116–1121 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Diffenbaugh, N. S. et al. Quantifying the influence of global warming on unprecedented extreme climate events. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 4881–4886 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Diffenbaugh, N. S., Singh, D. & Mankin, J. S. Unprecedented climate events: historical changes, aspirational targets and national commitments. Sci. Adv. 4, eaao3354 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zidane, T. E. K. et al. Power systems and microgrids resilience enhancement strategies: a review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 207, 114953 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Venkatasubramanian, B. V. & Panteli, M. Power system resilience during 2001–2022: a bibliometric and correlation analysis. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 188, 113862 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Panteli, M. & Mancarella, P. Influence of extreme weather and climate change on the resilience of power systems: impacts and possible mitigation strategies. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 127, 259–270 (2015). This work examines the impacts of extreme weather on power system components and outlines modelling and mitigation strategies for assessing and enhancing power system resilience.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Swain, D. L., Singh, D., Touma, D. & Diffenbaugh, N. S. Attributing extreme events to climate change: a new frontier in a warming world. One Earth 2, 522–527 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Grubler, A. et al. A low energy demand scenario for meeting the 1.5 °C target and sustainable development goals without negative emission technologies. Nat. Energy 3, 515–527 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Paul, S., Poudyal, A., Poudel, S., Dubey, A. & Wang, Z. Resilience assessment and planning in power distribution systems: past and future considerations. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 189, 113991 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wang, K. et al. Resilience-oriented power system planning amidst extreme events via vehicle-to-grid coordination. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 172, 111202 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Li, Y. et al. Extreme typhoon events trigger long-lasting power outages and require demand-side solutions to enhance energy resiliency. Commun. Earth Environ. 6, 136 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Xu, L., Lin, N., Poor, H. V., Xi, D. & Perera, A. D. Quantifying cascading power outages during climate extremes considering renewable energy integration. Nat. Commun. 16, 2582 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jasiūnas, J., Lund, P. D. & Mikkola, J. Energy system resilience: a review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 150, 111476 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yang, Z., Zhang, H., Li, H., Moura, S. & Song, Y. Toward a sustainable megalopolis by reconciling power system decarbonization and urban health resilience. Commun. Earth Environ. 7, 174 (2026).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kamarajah, S. et al. Energy security as a crucial component of health infrastructure: global evidence and actions. Lancet Planet. Health 9, 101329 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Craig, M. T. et al. Overcoming the disconnect between energy system and climate modeling. Joule 6, 1405–1417 (2022). This work identifies key disconnects between power system and climate modelling, and proposes a research agenda for developing power system-tailored climate datasets and models capable of incorporating them.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tierney, K. & Bruneau, M. Conceptualizing and measuring resilience: a key to disaster loss reduction. TR News 250, 14–17 (2007).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Cimellaro, G. P., Reinhorn, A. M. & Bruneau, M. Framework for analytical quantification of disaster resilience. Eng. Struct. 32, 3639–3649 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Panteli, M., Mancarella, P., Trakas, D. N., Kyriakides, E. & Hatziargyriou, N. D. Metrics and quantification of operational and infrastructure resilience in power systems. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 32, 4732–4742 (2017). This work introduces time-dependent metrics for quantifying power system resilience across system degradation, post-event disruption and recovery phases.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Henry, D. & Ramirez-Marquez, J. E. Generic metrics and quantitative approaches for system resilience as a function of time. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 99, 114–122 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ouyang, M., Dueñas-Osorio, L. & Min, X. A three-stage resilience analysis framework for urban infrastructure systems. Struct. Saf. 36–37, 23–31 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ghanbari, M. & Jiang, J. A comprehensive review on power system resilience: definition, assessment and enhancement strategies. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 172, 111149 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhou, D. et al. Resilience quantification of offshore wind farm cluster under the joint influence of typhoon and its secondary disasters. Appl. Energy 383, 125323 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wang, C., Ju, P., Wu, F., Pan, X. & Wang, Z. A systematic review on power system resilience from the perspective of generation, network and load. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 167, 112567 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yu, S., Wei, C., Fang, F., Liu, M. & Chen, Y. Resilience assessment of electric-thermal energy networks considering cascading failure under ice disasters. Appl. Energy 369, 123533 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Liu, X., Owen, J. S., Xie, Q. & Wang, T. Resilience improvement framework based on strategy optimization of power systems to typhoons. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 267, 111855 (2026).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Li, Y., Ma, L., Zhai, C., Akiyama, M. & Qin, H. A probabilistic framework for assessing and enhancing the resilience of power systems to typhoon hazards. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 265, 111607 (2026).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ouyang, M. & Dueñas-Osorio, L. Multi-dimensional hurricane resilience assessment of electric power systems. Struct. Saf. 48, 15–24 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dong, S. et al. Post-disaster multi-timescale coordinated restoration of power and thermal cyber-physical system considering hot standby resources. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 17, 634–649 (2026).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hu, Z. et al. Meteorological–electrical integrated real-time resilience assessment for power systems based on deep learning methods. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 16, 3700–3713 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sayarshad, H. R. & Ghorbanloo, R. Evaluating the resilience of electrical power line outages caused by wildfires. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 240, 109588 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Li, B. & Mostafavi, A. Unraveling fundamental properties of power system resilience curves using unsupervised machine learning. Energy AI 16, 100351 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ghasemi, S. & Moshtagh, J. Distribution system restoration after extreme events considering distributed generators and static energy storage systems with mobile energy storage systems dispatch in transportation systems. Appl. Energy 310, 118507 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Younesi, A. et al. Trends in modern power systems resilience: state-of-the-art review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 162, 112397 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ruan, J., Xu, Z. & Su, H. Towards interdisciplinary integration of electrical engineering and earth science. Nat. Rev. Electr. Eng. 1, 278–279 (2024). This work identifies epistemological, methodological, spatiotemporal and conceptual barriers between electrical engineering and climate science, and outlines pathways towards interdisciplinary integration and integrated climate–power system modelling.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Panteli, M., Trakas, D. N., Mancarella, P. & Hatziargyriou, N. D. Power systems resilience assessment: hardening and smart operational enhancement strategies. Proc. IEEE 105, 1202–1213 (2017). This work develops a quantitative, multiphase assessment framework for power system resilience and outlines infrastructure hardening and smart operational strategies for resilience enhancement.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Shi, Q., Liu, W., Zeng, B., Hui, H. & Li, F. Enhancing distribution system resilience against extreme weather events: concept review, algorithm summary and future vision. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 138, 107860 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Liu, H., Wang, C., Ju, P. & Li, H. A sequentially preventive model enhancing power system resilience against extreme-weather-triggered failures. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 156, 111945 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lei, S. et al. Power economic dispatch against extreme weather conditions: the price of resilience. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 157, 111994 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jacob, R. A., Paul, S., Chowdhury, S., Gel, Y. R. & Zhang, J. Real-time outage management in active distribution networks using reinforcement learning over graphs. Nat. Commun. 15, 4766 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Shi, Q. et al. Co-optimization of repairs and dynamic network reconfiguration for improved distribution system resilience. Appl. Energy 318, 119245 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Shuai, H., Li, F., She, B., Wang, X. & Zhao, J. Post-storm repair crew dispatch for distribution grid restoration using stochastic Monte Carlo tree search and deep neural networks. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 144, 108477 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ding, T. et al. Multiperiod distribution system restoration with routing repair crews, mobile electric vehicles and soft-open-point networked microgrids. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 11, 4795–4808 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yang, M., Wang, H., Xu, Y. & Chen, Y. Dynamic load restoration of coupled power-transportation systems considering healthcare system operation. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 17, 1093–1107 (2026).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kwasinski, A., Andrade, F., Castro-Sitiriche, M. J. & O’Neill-Carrillo, E. Hurricane Maria effects on Puerto Rico electric power infrastructure. IEEE Power Energy Technol. Syst. J. 6, 85–94 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Potts, J., Tiedmann, H. R., Stephens, K. K., Faust, K. M. & Castellanos, S. Enhancing power system resilience to extreme weather events: a qualitative assessment of Winter Storm Uri. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 103, 104309 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kelder, T. et al. How to stop being surprised by unprecedented weather. Nat. Commun. 16, 2382 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Alcayna, T. et al. Climate-sensitive disease outbreaks in the aftermath of extreme climatic events: a scoping review. One Earth 5, 336–350 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lee, C. C., Maron, M. & Mostafavi, A. Community-scale big data reveals disparate impacts of the Texas winter storm of 2021 and its managed power outage. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun. 9, 335 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Thompson, V. et al. The 2021 western North America heat wave among the most extreme events ever recorded globally. Sci. Adv. 8, eabm6860 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Morris, J. et al. Quantifying both socioeconomic and climate uncertainty in coupled human–Earth systems analysis. Nat. Commun. 16, 2703 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Najafi, J., Peiravi, A. & Guerrero, J. M. Power distribution system improvement planning under hurricanes based on a new resilience index. Sustain. Cities Soc. 39, 592–604 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hong, H. P., Li, S. H. & Duan, Z. D. Typhoon wind hazard estimation and mapping for coastal region in mainland China. Nat. Hazards Rev. 17, 04016001 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hou, H. et al. Damage prediction of 10 kV power towers in distribution network under typhoon disaster based on data-driven model. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 142, 108307 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Salman, A. M. & Li, Y. Multihazard risk assessment of electric power systems. J. Struct. Eng. 143, 04016198 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Shen, L., Tang, Y. & Tang, L. C. Understanding key factors affecting power systems resilience. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 212, 107621 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hollnagel, E., Woods, D. D. & Leveson, N. (eds) Resilience Engineering: Concepts and Precepts (Ashgate, 2006).

  • Yang, C. et al. Low modulus Ti-rich biocompatible TiNbZrTaHf concentrated alloys with exceptional plasticity. Mater. Res. Lett. 11, 604–612 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • O’Neill, B. C. et al. Achievements and needs for the climate change scenario framework. Nat. Clim. Change 10, 1074–1084 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhou, S. et al. Robust changes in global subtropical circulation under greenhouse warming. Nat. Commun. 15, 96 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • McGloin, R. et al. Substantial increases in the likelihood of extreme fire weather events for fire-prone ecosystems in Australia. npj Nat. Hazards 3, 28 (2026).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Vousdoukas, M. I. et al. Global probabilistic projections of extreme sea levels show intensification of coastal flood hazard. Nat. Commun. 9, 2360 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chand, S. S. et al. Declining tropical cyclone frequency under global warming. Nat. Clim. Change 12, 655–661 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zobel, Z., Wang, J., Wuebbles, D. J. & Kotamarthi, V. R. High-resolution dynamical downscaling ensemble projections of future extreme temperature distributions for the United States. Earths Future 5, 1234–1251 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Miller, S., Ormaza-Zulueta, N., Koppa, N. & Dancer, A. Statistical downscaling differences strongly alter projected climate damages. Commun. Earth Environ. 6, 145 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hess, P., Aich, M., Pan, B. & Boers, N. Fast, scale-adaptive and uncertainty-aware downscaling of Earth system model fields with generative machine learning. Nat. Mach. Intell. 7, 363–373 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ruan, J. et al. Toward AI-pervasive electric energy systems: concept, framework, vulnerability and visions. Nexus 3, 100119 (2026).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Li, Y. et al. Artificial intelligence-based methods for renewable power system operation. Nat. Rev. Electr. Eng. 1, 163–179 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • van der Zwaan, B. et al. Electricity- and hydrogen-driven energy system sector-coupling in net-zero CO2 emission pathways. Nat. Commun. 16, 1368 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mirzapour, O., Rui, X. & Sahraei-Ardakani, M. Grid-enhancing technologies: progress, challenges and future research directions. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 230, 110304 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wang, C. et al. Impacts of climate change, population growth and power sector decarbonization on urban building energy use. Nat. Commun. 14, 6434 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Artime, O. et al. Robustness and resilience of complex networks. Nat. Rev. Phys. 6, 114–131 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ma, X., Zhou, H. & Li, Z. On the resilience of modern power systems: a complex network perspective. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 152, 111646 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Liu, Z. et al. Complex network approaches for vulnerability assessment and resilience enhancement in power systems. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 86, 104859 (2026).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Rocchetta, R. Enhancing the resilience of critical infrastructures: statistical analysis of power grid spectral clustering and post-contingency vulnerability metrics. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 159, 112185 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hou, G. et al. Resilience assessment and enhancement evaluation of power distribution systems subjected to ice storms. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 230, 108964 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Xu, L. et al. Risk-aware electricity dispatch with large-scale distributed renewable integration under climate extremes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 122, e2426620122 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Stankovski, A., Gjorgiev, B., Locher, L. & Sansavini, G. Power blackouts in Europe: analyses, key insights and recommendations from empirical evidence. Joule 7, 2468–2484 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • McCollum, D. L., Gambhir, A., Rogelj, J. & Wilson, C. Energy modellers should explore extremes more systematically in scenarios. Nat. Energy 5, 104–107 (2020). This work calls for the systematic exploration of extreme outcomes in long-horizon energy scenarios through model-based and complementary off-model analyses.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Briol, F. X., Oates, C. J., Girolami, M., Osborne, M. A. & Sejdinovic, D. Probabilistic integration: a role in statistical computation? Stat. Sci. 34, 1–22 (2019).

    MathSciNet 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zanetti, L. Confidence in probabilistic risk assessment. Philos. Sci. 91, 702–720 (2024).

    Article 
    MathSciNet 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lu, T., Zhang, L., Zhang, X. & Zhao, Z. Beyond risk: a measure of distribution uncertainty. Inf. Syst. Res. 36, 944–961 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Linkov, I. et al. Resilience stress testing for critical infrastructure. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 82, 103323 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ruiz, C. & Conejo, A. J. Robust transmission expansion planning. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 242, 390–401 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Vayanos, P., Georghiou, A. & Yu, H. Robust optimization with decision-dependent information discovery. Manage. Sci. 72, 1509–1528 (2026).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhou, S., Pan, L., Xiu, N. & Li, G. Y. A 0/1 constrained optimization solving sample average approximation for chance constrained programming. Math. Oper. Res. 50, 2688–2716 (2025).

    Article 
    MathSciNet 

    Google Scholar
     

  • IRENA. Planning for the Renewable Future: Long-term Modelling and Tools to Expand Variable Renewable Power in Emerging Economies (International Renewable Energy Agency, 2017).

  • Lee, J.-Y. et al. Future global climate: scenario-based projections and near-term information. In Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) 553–672 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2021).

  • Ralston Fonseca, F. et al. Climate-induced tradeoffs in planning and operating costs of a regional electricity system. Environ. Sci. Technol. 55, 11204–11215 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fischer, E. M. et al. Record-breaking extremes in a warming climate. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 6, 456–470 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zscheischler, J. et al. A typology of compound weather and climate events. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 1, 333–347 (2020). This work establishes a four-part typology of compound weather and climate events and outlines analytical and modelling approaches for assessing their combined risks.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Raymond, C. et al. Understanding and managing connected extreme events. Nat. Clim. Change 10, 611–621 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Schneider, T., Leung, L. R. & Wills, R. C. Opinion: optimizing climate models with process knowledge, resolution and artificial intelligence. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 24, 7041–7062 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Froyland, G., Giannakis, D., Lintner, B. R., Pike, M. & Slawinska, J. Spectral analysis of climate dynamics with operator-theoretic approaches. Nat. Commun. 12, 6570 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Seo, H. et al. Ocean mesoscale and frontal-scale ocean–atmosphere interactions and influence on large-scale climate: a review. J. Clim. 36, 1981–2013 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sun, Y. Q. et al. Can AI weather models predict out-of-distribution gray swan tropical cyclones? Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 122, e2420914122 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Orlove, B., Shwom, R., Markowitz, E. & Cheong, S. M. Climate decision-making. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 45, 271–303 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • O’Neill, B. C. et al. The roads ahead: narratives for shared socioeconomic pathways describing world futures in the 21st century. Glob. Environ. Change 42, 169–180 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • O’Neill, B. C. et al. A new scenario framework for climate change research: the concept of shared socioeconomic pathways. Clim. Change 122, 387–400 (2014). This work establishes the SSP framework for combining alternative socioeconomic futures with climate forcing pathways in impacts, adaptation and mitigation research.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wallis, P., Colson, J. & Chilosi, D. Structural change and economic growth in the British economy before the Industrial Revolution, 1500–1800. J. Econ. Hist. 78, 862–903 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hung, H. F. Recent trends in global economic inequality. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 47, 349–367 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bazilian, M. et al. Accelerating the global transformation to 21st century power systems. Electr. J. 26, 39–51 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rosso, R., Wang, X., Liserre, M., Lu, X. & Engelken, S. Grid-forming converters: control approaches, grid-synchronization and future trends—a review. IEEE Open J. Ind. Appl. 2, 93–109 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhang, Y. et al. Wide-bandgap semiconductors and power electronics as pathways to carbon neutrality. Nat. Rev. Electr. Eng. 2, 155–172 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Möller, T. et al. Achieving net zero greenhouse gas emissions critical to limit climate tipping risks. Nat. Commun. 15, 6192 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dörfler, F. & Grammatico, S. Gather-and-broadcast frequency control in power systems. Automatica 79, 296–305 (2017).

    Article 
    MathSciNet 

    Google Scholar
     

  • South, L. F., Riabiz, M., Teymur, O. & Oates, C. J. Postprocessing of MCMC. Annu. Rev. Stat. Appl. 9, 529–555 (2022).

    Article 
    MathSciNet 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Van Der Weijde, A. H. & Hobbs, B. F. The economics of planning electricity transmission to accommodate renewables: using two-stage optimisation to evaluate flexibility and the cost of disregarding uncertainty. Energy Econ 34, 2089–2101 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Roos, E. & den Hertog, D. Reducing conservatism in robust optimization. INFORMS J. Comput. 32, 1109–1127 (2020).

    MathSciNet 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Liu, F. & Wang, R. A theory for measures of tail risk. Math. Oper. Res. 46, 1109–1128 (2021).

    Article 
    MathSciNet 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Srikrishnan, V. et al. Uncertainty analysis in multi-sector systems: considerations for risk analysis, projection and planning for complex systems. Earths Future 10, e2021EF002644 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Berger, J. O. & Smith, L. A. On the statistical formalism of uncertainty quantification. Annu. Rev. Stat. Appl. 6, 433–460 (2019).

    Article 
    MathSciNet 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Smith, J. E. & Von Winterfeldt, D. Anniversary article: decision analysis in management science. Manage. Sci. 50, 561–574 (2004).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bistline, J. E. Electric sector capacity planning under uncertainty: climate policy and natural gas in the US. Energy Econ 51, 236–251 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ranjbar, H. & Saber, H. A risk-aware and second-order cone programming model for wind expansion planning considering correlated uncertainties using the copula method. Sustain. Energy Grids Netw. 38, 101307 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gu, C. et al. Toward climate-adaptive low-carbon power system planning: a multistage stochastic framework considering climate uncertainties. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 22, 3938–3949 (2026). This work develops a multistage stochastic framework that integrates the long-term evolution and uncertainty of climate variables into low-carbon power system planning.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ding, Y. et al. Optimal distributed energy management for local energy community: a decision-regret-oriented smart predict-and-optimize approach. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 21, 9690–9700 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Haasnoot, M., Kwakkel, J. H., Walker, W. E. & Ter Maat, J. Dynamic adaptive policy pathways: a method for crafting robust decisions for a deeply uncertain world. Glob. Environ. Change 23, 485–498 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Karniadakis, G. E. et al. Physics-informed machine learning. Nat. Rev. Phys. 3, 422–440 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bodnar, C. et al. A foundation model for the Earth system. Nature 641, 1180–1187 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Camps-Valls, G. et al. Artificial intelligence for modeling and understanding extreme weather and climate events. Nat. Commun. 16, 1919 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hafner, D., Pasukonis, J., Ba, J. & Lillicrap, T. Mastering diverse control tasks through world models. Nature 640, 647–653 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Embrechts, P. & Wüthrich, M. V. Recent challenges in actuarial science. Annu. Rev. Stat. Appl. 9, 119–140 (2022).

    Article 
    MathSciNet 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ingels, M. W., Botzen, W. W., Aerts, J. C., Brusselaers, J. & Tesselaar, M. The state of the art and future of climate risk insurance modeling. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1541, 100–114 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wing, I. S. The synthesis of bottom-up and top-down approaches to climate policy modeling: electric power technology detail in a social accounting framework. Energy Econ. 30, 547–573 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ilic, M. D. From hierarchical to open access electric power systems. Proc. IEEE 95, 1060–1084 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Seneviratne, S. I. et al. Weather and climate extreme events in a changing climate. In Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) 1513–1766 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2021).

  • Zscheischler, J. et al. Future climate risk from compound events. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 469–477 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kamwa, I. & Badrzadeh, B. Future power systems: dynamic stability must lead the way. IEEE Power Energy Mag 24, 4–19 (2026).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Lombardi, F. et al. Near-optimal energy planning strategies with modeling to generate alternatives to flexibly explore practically desirable options. Joule 9, 102144 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Eswarappa Prameela, S. et al. Materials for extreme environments. Nat. Rev. Mater. 8, 81–88 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Stürmer, J. et al. Increasing the resilience of the Texas power grid against extreme storms by hardening critical lines. Nat. Energy 9, 526–535 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mohanty, A. et al. Power system resilience and strategies for a sustainable infrastructure: a review. Alex. Eng. J. 105, 261–279 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Liu, J., Qin, C. & Yu, Y. Enhancing distribution system resilience with proactive islanding and RCS-based fast fault isolation and service restoration. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 11, 2381–2395 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sedgh, S. A., Doostizadeh, M., Aminifar, F. & Shahidehpour, M. Resilient-enhancing critical load restoration using mobile power sources with incomplete information. Sustain. Energy Grids Netw. 26, 100418 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Buticchi, G., Wheeler, P. & Boroyevich, D. The more-electric aircraft and beyond. Proc. IEEE 111, 356–370 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     



  • Source link