Collaboration aims to brings AI- and advanced-analytics-enabled scheduling to project delivery
McKinsey and Alice Technologies have formalised a commercial alliance centred on the application of generative scheduling to large capital projects, building on roughly five years of joint client work across infrastructure, data centres, energy, mining and manufacturing
The collaboration has to date been deployed across more than 35 clients. McKinsey cites schedule reductions of up to 20 percent and, in one documented case involving a global data centre operator, a reduction of approximately 40 percent against the baseline construction programme, achieved by simplifying schedule logic and optimising sequencing and resource allocation across more than 13 identified inefficiencies.
The technical basis of Alice Technologies’ platform is a parametric execution model that ingests BIM data and Primavera P6 schedules to simulate millions of sequencing and resource-loading combinations.
Discover what’s new in technology for architecture, engineering and construction — read the latest edition of AEC Magazine
👉 Subscribe FREE here
Labour, equipment, materials, spatial constraints and sequence are treated as adjustable variables, allowing planners to evaluate trade-offs across cost, duration and risk without committing to a single deterministic schedule.
The approach is distinct from conventional critical-path scheduling in that it generates and ranks alternatives rather than requiring planners to construct scenarios manually.
McKinsey’s involvement centres on embedding the tool within broader project controls and operating model changes, a distinction the firm emphasises to qualify the scope of performance claims.
AI content is independently produced by the AEC Magazine editorial team.
HP and NVIDIA supports the creation of this content, but all opinions
and coverage remain editorially independent.
Mark Pitcher, a partner in McKinsey’s Capital Excellence Practice, noted that “building more robust, analytics-driven schedules is a critical opportunity for the industry,” while the firm’s published commentary cautions that lasting improvement requires capability building and integration with existing planning processes rather than software deployment alone.
The alliance is indicative of a wider pattern in capital project advisory, where consulting firms are moving toward structured technology partnerships alongside traditional methodology offerings. The construction sector has historically lagged other industries in productivity improvement, and schedule and cost overruns on major programmes remain a persistent problem, which provides the context for growing interest in simulation-based planning tools.
The practical constraints of generative scheduling at scale — data quality requirements, model fidelity, and the organisational change needed to act on outputs — mean that results are likely to vary considerably by project type and owner maturity. McKinsey acknowledges this implicitly in its framing of the alliance as a combined technology and operating model proposition rather than a software-only offer. The degree to which the documented client outcomes are replicable across a broader portfolio remains to be established as deployment expands.
Related articles:
